Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Typo (content management system)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Majorly (talk) 15:58, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Typo (content management system)

Fails WP:NOTABILITY and WP:VERIFY, no assertion of notability, no third party links. Jackaranga 17:11, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable. Realkyhick 17:18, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unable to find any reliable sources. JulesH 18:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'd be terribly happy if sources could be found, because Typo is one of the best known and oldest Ruby on Rails-based projects. Not exactly widely unused either... The sourcing and proving notability otherwise is a major headache without such sources though. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 19:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the official Ruby on Rails website calls it "one of the oldest and most visible of Rails open source projects". The only quotation is cited per WP:VERIFY, and the rest of the article is not "likely to be challenged" per that guideline - first-party links would seem entirely appropriate for things like a list of features. — ceejayoz ^talk 20:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Looks notable; sources should be found. --Optichan 17:01, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable; sources would be good though cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.