Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V&A Village Fete
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- V&A Village Fete (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable event, has been marked with {notability} for over a year Jrtayloriv (talk) 05:30, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Seems notable enough for me as there are plenty of web results and sources for this event. AtheWeatherman 17:43, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 20:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or merge with Victoria and Albert Museum per WP:BARE. Bearian (talk) 19:41, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Notable enough for me as there are plenty of web results and sources for this event. - Ret.Prof (talk) 22:38, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.