Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vietnamese New Native Language
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:05, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Vietnamese New Native Language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
no evidence of official use that I can find. Ironholds (talk) 10:34, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. Afkatk (talk) 10:46, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Allegedly created in... 2009... by a redlink person with the epithet "The Great." No references whatsoever. No evidence that it is used by anyone other than the few users who vandalized the page since this nomination. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 11:53, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I couldn't find anything showing this is official either. Frehley 11:56, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Interesting, but no sources at all to show that this Viet version of Newspeak. "Viettonese" gets only one two hits, and this article is one of them. The link to www.gamevn.com in the article is a Vietnamese language game website forum. Mandsford (talk) 12:53, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, weakly and without prejudice. The article might be about some proposal for Vietnamese spelling reform, and would appear to make claims of notability; and we are stymied from searching for sources for that because of the author's limited skills in English. (Which are, however, far more impressive than my own in Vietnamese.) - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:45, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, the creator seems to be trying to wreak havoc here and there. He created the same article in the website www.gamevn.com, which made him an unwelcome face. So in my opinion, this is just another of his pranks (or havoc? to be more correct). Furthermore, it's a clear case of original research, and without any reference/citation to boost. I suggest that it should be hidden or otherwise pending/moderated until the creator provided at least *1* reference/citation. Oaioai (talk) 15:25, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no reliable sources to back up article. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:45, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no reliable sources - there is no way this language has 2000,000 speakers without many sources.YobMod 14:37, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What's the word for "snowball" in Viettonese? Mandsford (talk) 18:53, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.