Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water conflicts
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn. See below. Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Water conflicts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be book-like, the Literature section is probably the best example. A transwiki to Wikibooks could do, as this might be the perfect place for this article. May be some original reasearch involved too. ConCompS (Talk to me) 04:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to WikiBooks. Armbrust (talk) 13:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 05:45, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. What I will do is wikify the article so that it at least doesn't appear more suitable for WikiBooks than the encyclopedia. Please revise votes if necessary. It will still need some work, but I feel strongly that it should stay, as I know that this is actually a very mainstream topic in the scholarly community. Plenty of work has been done in this area to establish notability. Transwiki to Books will kill this topic, I think.—DMCer™ 07:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Here is the difference between the nominated version and my revisions.—DMCer™ 08:59, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as the article was rewriten to comfort Wikipedia guidelines. Armbrust (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn request. Posting on
WP:ANmy talk page shortly. ConCompS talk review 04:10, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.