Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X=Prem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

X=Prem

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

De-PROD'ed. WP:TOOSOON and fails WP:NFF for a future film lacking a notable production. A draft at Draft:X=Prem exists. If merged into the draft, I'd suggest a history merge — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet NFF due to lack of significant coverage on production. Draft should be worked on instead -- Ab207 (talk) 20:31, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:53, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TOOSOON. AFC should not be circumvented like this. BOVINEBOY2008 08:51, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.