Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zilog Z380

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Zilog Z80#Derivatives. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zilog Z380

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article, sources cited (mostly manuals?), and my BEFORE do not suggest this piece of tech (processor) meets GNG. My best find is a single sentence here from PediaPress, which may not be reliable as it republishes Wikipedia texts... Can anyone find better sources to rescue it or suggest a redirect/merge target? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Zilog_Z80#Derivatives where it is mentioned briefly. Basic facts about the chip (produced by Zilog, a 32-bit successor to the Z80, etc.) are verfiable from secondary-source directories like [1]. I haven't been able to find much about the history or impact beyond what is in the directories, so haven't established notability. Hence a redirect and perhaps merge of basic facts seems appropriate. The Z380 is always mentioned in context as a successor to the Z80, so redirecting to the Derviatives section of the Z80 article seems the best target. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 18:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Per Mark viking. Seems like a reasonable choice - unless sources supporting notability for a stand-alone article are found. Pavlor (talk) 05:06, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is your problem and why do you want to delete this article? Gábor Mayer (talk) 10:57, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not meeting WP:GNG. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:28, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.