Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 July 6
Appearance
July 6
[edit]- Arunreginald (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Deeyah was born in 1977; hence there's no way a picture of her could be over 50 years old. -Nard 01:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as an obvious copyvio. Nyttend (talk) 03:35, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete cannot possibly meet copyright requirements in Pakistan. — BQZip01 — talk 06:40, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Mgiganteus1 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Fails WP:NFCC#1. -Nard 02:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Neutral on this: if I read it rightly, the fair use rationale argues that this is an extremely rare plant for which we have virtually no chance of getting a free picture. I want to say keep because of this, but I don't know if WP:IAR is suitable here. Nyttend (talk) 03:40, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete image is already on commons. Deal with the copyright issue/rarity there. — BQZip01 — talk 06:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- No claim of fair use. Has two licenses, both red linked. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:12, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio; completely replaceable (someone in Topeka, KS grab a camera!) — BQZip01 — talk 06:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- A sign from Lafayette, Ohio. Claims to be self-made, but it's either copied from an official village sign image, or a derivative work of one: a copyvio, not eligible for Creative Commons. Nyttend (talk) 03:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio, if it is as this user claims. — BQZip01 — talk 06:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- A sign from Lafayette, Ohio. Claims to be self-made, but it's either copied from an official village sign image, or a derivative work of one: a copyvio, not eligible for any free license. There's no license tag, but as it's extremely similar to Image:PatriotCitySign1.jpg, which the uploader also claims to have made, and which has a Creative Commons license, I'm going to assume that this was intended to have something similar. Nyttend (talk) 03:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep no evidence of copyvio. — BQZip01 — talk 06:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- It looks like an advertisement or other official sign; why do you believe that it's not a copyvio? Nyttend (talk) 12:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Given its crude construction and this person's tendency to add to this one article, it is likely that this person probably made the sign himself/herself. I'll admit it looks like a sign, but that is not evidence of a copyvio. Just because it looks like something doesn't mean it is. — BQZip01 — talk 18:11, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- My point is as above: if the user created this image, it's a copy of someone else's work, a derivative work, which can't be claimed as the user's own creation. Nyttend (talk) 20:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- I would agree with that case, but there is no evidence that it is a copy of anything else. My point is that this guy probably works for them and made these picts. — BQZip01 — talk 02:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it's been removed from its context and is now orphaned, so Delete — BQZip01 — talk 12:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- I would agree with that case, but there is no evidence that it is a copy of anything else. My point is that this guy probably works for them and made these picts. — BQZip01 — talk 02:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- My point is as above: if the user created this image, it's a copy of someone else's work, a derivative work, which can't be claimed as the user's own creation. Nyttend (talk) 20:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Given its crude construction and this person's tendency to add to this one article, it is likely that this person probably made the sign himself/herself. I'll admit it looks like a sign, but that is not evidence of a copyvio. Just because it looks like something doesn't mean it is. — BQZip01 — talk 18:11, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- The picture states that David Paxton is both the subject and the creator of the picture. Seeing that he's obviously in an official ceremony, I seriously doubt that he has something set up to take the picture remotely: hence, it's a copyvio. Nyttend (talk) 03:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Someone using his camera to take a picture at his direction on his camera still entitles him the copyright. — BQZip01 — talk 06:48, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- But how could the subject of this picture have taken a picture of himself? In case what I wrote above was unclear, that's my point: it can't possibly be a picture taken by the uploader. Nyttend (talk) 12:36, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Then the information needs to be updated, not the image deleted. — BQZip01 — talk 12:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- But how could the subject of this picture have taken a picture of himself? In case what I wrote above was unclear, that's my point: it can't possibly be a picture taken by the uploader. Nyttend (talk) 12:36, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- It's therefore either a private photograph, or it's a picture taken from somewhere: unless it comes from a free content source (which I doubt, and which would have to be proven), it's a copyright violation now, because the rightful owner of the copyright has not given permission to have the photograph. Nyttend (talk) 13:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- DELETE... Nyttend get a life..you have some real serious issues.. you just know it all don't you... You were there when the photo was taken? Your right Mr. Paxton did not actually trip the shutter himself.. still his photo. I am sorry but after reading so many of your posts especially about the issues surrounding General Lafayette's name ie. "marquis", you really seem to be a person that I will never get along with. You have so much trouble believing anything you can't conceive of yourself. you are too much of a control freak for me. Not intended as a personal attack, but sheesh, why would we bother to debate this issue with you? We really don't care if you delete it or not. Less hassle then dealing with you. Well our vote is DELETE
- Who are "we"? Nyttend (talk) 02:09, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- Guyfromboracay (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Silly and superfluous image added for the sake of getting in in tin foil hat. Article is well-enough illustrated already. Useless outwith that article. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 12:25, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete "Silly" is not part of our criteria, but orphaned and no encyclopedic use are. — BQZip01 — talk 18:12, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - it was uploaded four days ago. Editors are free to use PD images whether or not they have a place in mainspace. — xDanielx T/C\R 22:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- Andre_Engels (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic, Orphaned, no source. -Nard 18:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- It does have a source (Library of Congress), however from http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/res/506_roth.html I think this is to be considered NC, and therefore should be deleted. - Andre Engels (talk) 21:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete The given source does not have the stated image. Furthermore, the copyright warning given in the above link states specifically the image should "not be used for 'advertising or trade purposes.' The Library cannot provide further interpretation of this phrase. Privacy and publicity rights may also apply. In addition, images by individual photographers may be protected by copyright. The Library recommends that patrons obtain permission from the creator agency, the photographer or the photographer's heirs before publishing or otherwise distributing images from the collection, except as allowed under 'fair use.'" So basically this is a fair use image, and it needs to be used in such a manner that meets Wikipedia criteria or deleted. — BQZip01 — talk 02:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Commons image showing through. -Nv8200p talk 03:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- SwedishConqueror (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Duplicate image, orphaned, WP:OR. — BQZip01 — talk 20:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- ChimeTenSky (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:38, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, potentially encyclopedic, loader's status irrelevant, wrong tag as this cannot be released under GFDL. — BQZip01 — talk 02:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Low quality, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 20:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, not encyclopedic. — BQZip01 — talk 02:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Very poor resolution image (.jpg). Surely must be copyrighted from somewhere due to the fact that the user does not add details to his images. Toyotaboy95 (talk) 07:46, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- Niallgooch (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, potentially encyclopedic, loader's status irrelevant, probable copyvio. — BQZip01 — talk 02:58, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - de-orphaned, and not a copyvio. — xDanielx T/C\R 22:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- MikkaKutie91 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, copyvio. — BQZip01 — talk 02:58, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- MikkaKutie91 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, copyvio, loader's status irrelevant. — BQZip01 — talk 02:59, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep rightly placed here, but I just put it on my user page. — BQZip01 — talk 03:09, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:47, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete orphaned, blurry, low res — BQZip01 — talk 03:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Livedreamachieve (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete orphaned, probable copyvio — BQZip01 — talk 03:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Okjn3345mj (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete orphaned, unencyclopedic. — BQZip01 — talk 03:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Emperordarius (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned Nv8200p talk 21:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete orphaned. — BQZip01 — talk 03:12, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 21:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete orphaned, probable copyvio. — BQZip01 — talk 03:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete orphaned, unencyclopedic. — BQZip01 — talk 03:15, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete orphaned, unencyclopedic. — BQZip01 — talk 03:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete orphaned, completely encyclopedic, but other images already exist (WP isn't a gallery. — BQZip01 — talk 03:20, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Undefined structure, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep no longer orphaned. Structure was defined in the caption and clearly matches other pictures. — BQZip01 — talk 03:24, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- commons Fasach Nua (talk) 07:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 21:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete orphaned, unencyclopedic. — BQZip01 — talk 03:19, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Cyberwriter (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, No evidence permission was granted to use image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 21:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Mindsetatl (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic, copyvio — BQZip01 — talk 03:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thekingsizefive (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Timpennington (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 22:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:26, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Stprioleau (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 22:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Kadluboskifan (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 22:04, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Article deleted Nv8200p talk 22:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Article deleted Nv8200p talk 22:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Article deleted Nv8200p talk 22:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:31, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 22:08, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:31, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Chaosgeneration (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 22:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:31, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 22:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:32, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Karthikchndran (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Copyright violation, Watermarked Nv8200p talk 22:15, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:32, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 22:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic copyvio — BQZip01 — talk 03:32, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 22:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:32, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Kamranalam81 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 22:18, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 22:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- SugarFairyEriru (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 22:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- if the licence is valid commons, may have some use Fasach Nua (talk) 07:29, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- Nima_Yousefi (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 22:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic, copyvio — BQZip01 — talk 03:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- DiScOrD_tHe_LuNaTiC (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, No evidence permission was granted to use the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 22:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- No argument.DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC (talk) 14:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Low quality Nv8200p talk 22:28, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Seeratmast (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Low quality, Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 22:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, copyvio — BQZip01 — talk 03:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 23:02, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:35, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned Nv8200p talk 23:04, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned Nv8200p talk 23:04, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Suhaib_ahmad (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 23:08, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 23:08, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 23:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per above — BQZip01 — talk 03:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- OnlyoneMillz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 23:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 23:11, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:38, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Morton_devonshire (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 23:12, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep
Delete Orphaned,unencyclopedic still— BQZip01 — talk 03:39, 7 July 2008 (UTC) - Keep Image is being used in user space. -Nard 13:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
- keep To be used in userspace, UE Fasach Nua (talk) 07:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 23:14, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:39, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 23:18, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic, user's only contribution=WP:NOT — BQZip01 — talk 03:39, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- PlaymateFactFinder (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 23:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, copyvio...sigh...it's a shame too... — BQZip01 — talk 03:41, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Kate-pelling (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 23:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:41, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- PlaymateFactFinder (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 23:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic, see two above — BQZip01 — talk 03:41, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Simontmann77 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 23:24, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, copyvio — BQZip01 — talk 03:42, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 23:30, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- How did you determine that it's copyvio? Since it's uploaded tagged as CC/GFDL, if you can prove copyvio, it's speedyable as a blatant violation. —C.Fred (talk) 02:58, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- concur, doesn't appear to be a copyvio from the given info. — BQZip01 — talk 03:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- See here. I doubt the church got the image from Wikipedia, No evidence the uploader is the photographer or affiliated with the church. -Nv8200p talk 02:00, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, no apparent encyclopedic use, though I'm willing to be wrong here. — BQZip01 — talk 03:43, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Kikibrandao@gmail.com (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 23:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic — BQZip01 — talk 03:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)