Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 28

< December 27	December 29 >

December 28

File:10Pamiri1...jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image of non-notable people. No encyclopedic value. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 02:57, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:10Yagnobi people.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image of a non-notable person. No encyclopedic value. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 03:00, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1126ChainBridge-data.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned website screencapture. No encyclopedic value. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 03:02, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1126ChainBridgeRd.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned website screencapture. No encyclopedic value. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 03:02, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1194989212307889966sun ff77 01 svg med.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no encyclopedic value. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 03:06, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:120cellortho.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image. No encyclopedic value. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 03:14, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2004Vietnamese exports.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned and largely inaccurate image. Superseded by a higher quality svg version at File:Vietnamese-Exports-2004.svg. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 03:25, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AA COMP GEL.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with a higher quality version in PNG format located at File:Amino Acid Composition in Gelatin chart.png. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 03:29, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Glenfield trackplan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with a non-orphaned duplicate image in PNG format located at File:Glenfield trackplan.png Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 03:52, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Highlanders.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image of the letters "N" and "Y". No encyclopedic value. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 03:57, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Highlanders.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image of the letters "N" and "Y". No encyclopedic value. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 03:57, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hurstville trackplan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with a duplicate in PNG format located at File:Hurstville trackplan.png. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 03:59, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Statistical chart files uploaded by Anwar saadat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 04:49, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating all 140 files mass uploaded by Anwar saadat (talk · contribs), a user who was found to be a abusing multiple accounts. These files are all orphaned statistical chart images and do not have any encyclopedic value. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 04:50, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all and move to Commons. Statistical charts and graphs based upon census data are clearly within the scope of Commons, and have plenty of encyclopaedic value. Y u no be Russavia ^{ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)} 09:10, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Including maps with purple stains? Bulwersator (talk) 09:54, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete orphaned and only orphaned (at least part is now used) Bulwersator (talk) 10:21, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many appear to lack sources for their information. Those should be deleted, since they are unverifiable. (I don't know what Commons thinks about verifiability, but I should think they demand it for statistical media at the very least.) — This, that, and the other (talk) 23:30, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Viscount VV-818.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt this is the uploaders own work. Authorship is required in order to ascertain whether it might be PD, and of course dates of photo are also required. Y u no be Russavia ^{ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)} 08:21, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May or may not be released validly (very unlikely to be PD), but the description of its source is vague, and the user did not clarify the copyright status of images previously nominated for deletion. —innotata 01:27, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PSUHelmet.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute the source and fair use for this file, the original uploader gave the source as "The logo may be obtained from Penn State Nittany Lions football.", the next edit added another FUR giving the source as http://nationalchamps.net/Helmet_Project/ however that is likely as copy and paste from another uploaded file as if you look at this page the image is noticeably diffident.
As there is no logo on the helmet "Fair Use" does not apply as a free version is obtainable at any game. Mt king ^(edits) 08:55, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image and its use qualify under Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. No free equivalent. The football helmet is important to help identify the team in line with the intended branding.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

is replaceable as per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 11#File:LSU Helmet.png. Mt king ^(edits) 19:45, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marylandhelmet.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No Fair use to be claimed as the helmet has no logo, no need to use a copyright file when a free version can be taken at any game. Mt king ^(edits) 09:00, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image and its use qualify under Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. No free equivalent. The football helmet is important to help identify the team in line with the intended branding.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

is replaceable as per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 11#File:LSU Helmet.png. Mt king ^(edits) 19:45, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:North Carolina St.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The logo displayed on this file is not copyrightable as it contains only letters so there is no need to use a copyright image when a free one can be obtained at any game. Mt king ^(edits) 09:02, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image and its use qualify under Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. No free equivalent. The football helmet is important to help identify the team in line with the intended branding.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

is replaceable as per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 11#File:LSU Helmet.png. Mt king ^(edits) 19:45, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Duke.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The logo displayed on this file is not copyrightable as it contains only letters so there is no need to use a copyright image when a free one can be obtained at any game. Mt king ^(edits) 09:02, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image and its use qualify under Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. No free equivalent. The football helmet is important to help identify the team in line with the intended branding.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

is replaceable as per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 11#File:LSU Helmet.png. Mt king ^(edits) 19:46, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Georgia Tech.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The logo displayed on this file is not copyrightable as it contains only letters so there is no need to use a copyright image when a free one can be obtained at any game Mt king ^(edits) 09:03, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image and its use qualify under Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. No free equivalent. The football helmet is important to help identify the team in line with the intended branding.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

is replaceable as per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 11#File:LSU Helmet.png. Mt king ^(edits) 19:46, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:North Carolina Tar Heels football logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The logo displayed on this file is not copyrightable as it contains only letters so there is no need to use a copyright image when a free one can be obtained at any game Mt king ^(edits) 09:03, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image and its use qualify under Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. No free equivalent. The football helmet is important to help identify the team in line with the intended branding.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

is replaceable as per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 11#File:LSU Helmet.png. Mt king ^(edits) 19:46, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Virginia football helmet.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute the FUR for the helmet part of this image (as opposed to the logo part); there is no need to use a copyright image of the helmet with a copyright logo superimposed as it is replaceable with free picture taken at any game which will only need a FUR for the logo component. Mt king ^(edits) 09:23, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image and its use qualify under Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. No free equivalent. The football helmet is important to help identify the team in line with the intended branding.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

is replaceable as per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 11#File:LSU Helmet.png. Mt king ^(edits) 19:46, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Modern-universe.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lower quality than File:Merging galaxies NGC 4676 (captured by the Hubble Space Telescope).jpg. Bulwersator (talk) 10:19, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Baeyervilligerox.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, low quality (badGIF), not used in Baeyer–Villiger oxidation. Leyo 12:33, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ex 1% ample.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 04:53, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No need or point, we have File:Example.jpg. Rcsprinter (lecture) 16:21, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep until bugzilla:26233 is fixed. Ucucha (talk) 16:28, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I added link to bugzilla Bulwersator (talk) 17:36, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Backtrieb.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image lacking description for over 1 month, Usage potential minimal without further information. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:04, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Used on userpage, keep Bulwersator (talk) 18:06, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Isosafrole Line-Structure.png + 14 other files

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 04:56, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Renominating - was nominated for deletion on December 8 but was removed from Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 8 by a mistake. Same with 14 other files:

Original discussion was here: Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_December_8#File:3-.284-ethoxyphenyl.29prop-2-enoic_acid.PNG_+_22_others. The original reason for nominating was "Orphaned file, only used in user space". MGA73 (talk) 18:26, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Talesofthenewteentitans4starfire.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Old revision deleted Skier Dude (talk) 01:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination applies to old revision only. Non-free file with old, non-free revisions. Textbook violation of WP:NFCC#7. An uploader is refusing to allow me to delete the old revisions, egregiously and non-applicably citing "technical difficulties". -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:07, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If the only reason to keep it is for "attribution purposes" then just replace the "other_information" field in the {{Non-free media rationale}} with "{{DC-Comics-trademark-copyright}}<br/>Originally uploaded by {{user|DCincarnate}} on 27 April 2008‎." problem solved! Mt king ^(edits) 21:20, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the notes left on page it looks like there was an issue with a glitch in the page. Removal of the last "old version" caused the image to display as the wrong version. Now, that was over 3 years ago, so it may be time to run the experiment again to see if the glitch has been shaken out. If it hasn't we right back to where we are now. - J Greb (talk) 21:23, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the one who took it off Fbot's list twice. For the record, I'm not the uploader. The problem actually happened this past may, when an edit warrior was trying to replace the image in the page's infobox with a "more attractive" version by Michael Turner, and finally got to the point of uploading the Turner image over it; the glitch then made it so that any attempt to revert it to the original image would show the Turner image--even after the Turner image revisions were deleted. J Greb was the one to find a solution by uploading the new copy of the original. If Mtking's fix is adequate to meet en-wiki's licensing attribution requirements, then I'd have no objection to deleting the original version. (Caveat: I had discussed this off-wiki with an en-wiki admin who had suggested the initial removal of the Fbot tag, and then the use of the nobots template to prevent it after Fbot tagged it a second time.) rdfox 76 (talk) 23:45, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Old revisions violate NFCC criterion 7. As the original uploader does not have copyright on the image, no attribution to the uploader is required. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 00:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chris Ott cafe.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan - The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia. Unencyclopedic - The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in any Wikimedia project. I uploaded it of myself on a whim in 2006, and now feel ashamed for doing so. Please delete. It is of me. Dazedbythebell (talk) 21:37, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: original uploader is User:Sharnak Bulwersator (talk) 21:42, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as orphaned (except bot-generated gallery of all free uploads) and useless Bulwersator (talk) 21:42, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sharnak was my name then, but I changed it, and no longer remember the login number. I am Chris Ott.Dazedbythebell (talk) 21:45, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Please then delete as orphaned. Dazedbythebell (talk) 21:53, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stabilser on t55.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be original research; orphaned (except for two talk pages); information is unsourced ("The Gimp" is not an appropriate source designation). — This, that, and the other (talk) 23:27, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unclepaul.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, really no use — This, that, and the other (talk) 23:51, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.