Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 April 29

< April 28	April 30 >

April 29

File:Suren with Tanpura'.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

distorted, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 09:39, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Suren Das.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

photo of a notable individual, dubious self-work claim; uploader has a history of copyright violations FASTILY 09:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Program'.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

photo of a notable individual, dubious self-work claim; uploader has a history of copyright violations FASTILY 09:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Teachers'.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

photo of a notable individual, dubious self-work claim; uploader has a history of copyright violations FASTILY 09:41, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manabendra and manas'.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

photo of a notable individual, dubious self-work claim; uploader has a history of copyright violations FASTILY 09:41, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Priti Ranjan Roy'.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

photo of a notable individual, dubious self-work claim; uploader has a history of copyright violations FASTILY 09:41, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brothers'.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

photo of a notable individual, dubious self-work claim; uploader has a history of copyright violations FASTILY 09:41, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Suren Das and Bela '.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

photo of a notable individual, dubious self-work claim; uploader has a history of copyright violations FASTILY 09:41, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Priti and Alaka'.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

photo of a notable individual, dubious self-work claim; uploader has a history of copyright violations FASTILY 09:42, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manas Kumar Das & Alaka Das'.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

photo of a notable individual, dubious self-work claim; uploader has a history of copyright violations FASTILY 09:42, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Comilla Foundation Gold Medal'.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

photo of a notable individual, dubious self-work claim; uploader has a history of copyright violations FASTILY 09:42, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:National Capital Area Council logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not free and not in use Abel (talk) 13:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sad Clowns & Hillbillies Cover Art.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. The image has been relicensed as non-free and given an appropriate fair use rationale. clpo13_(talk) 22:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader incorrectly states this album cover is in the public domain. Cover was previously published on John Mellencamp's website, which means it is not in the public domain. DBZFan30 (talk) 14:05, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I relicensed the image as non-free and then added rationale. --George Ho (talk) 20:55, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Brick Field logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Clpo13 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking that this image is not unique enough to qualify for copyright in the United States, and should be tagged as {{PD-logo}}. Steel1943 (talk) 17:11, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to pd-logo and transfer to Commons. Salavat (talk) 02:50, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lynda Resnick.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Permission received in Ticket:2017042510026208. (non-admin closure)Mdann52 (talk) 18:09, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image is almost certainly flickrwashed. The EXIF data shows photoshop and the person has only uploaded one file to Flickr. It even says "copy" in the description. The original image (at least part of it) has been used previously on Forbes Majora (talk) 17:43, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to report this to Flickr? It should be relicensed as "all rights reserved" or something? George Ho (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@George Ho: As far as I know, the copyright holder would have to request a takedown from Flickr. I'm not aware of any method for us to report it. Just have to be vigilant and take into account all available information when making a determination of whether or not an image is truly free. --Majora (talk) 21:31, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ANARESAT Macquarie Island.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Link provided states copyright is from M & G Therin-Weise, not UNESCO. – Train2104 (t • c) 21:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is correct, I did write "M & G Therin Weise / UNESCO" to indicate that I got it from UNESCO but happy to revert to the original. Happy for it to be changed based on your experience. Please go ahead based on your judgement. Supcmd (talk) 22:54, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant to say is that the copyright link on the website says that "Any use of photographs requires a separate request for authorization from copyright holders.", this it's not PD. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: not PD. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 02:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK it looks like it has changed. It previously said Public Domain. Fine to delete it. Added db-author tag. Supcmd (talk) 04:04, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If the file previously said Public Domain on their website, Supcmd, that changes everything. If the copyright holder has at any time released it into the public domain, then it is and stays in the public domain. Can you find proof that the website previously listed it as public domain? I tried the Wayback Machine but didn't find anything. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:04, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:C10orf76 MSA orthologs.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid PD rationale. – Train2104 (t • c) 21:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.