Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 May 31

< May 30	June 1 >

May 31

File:People's beach1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 June 8. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:49, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:People's beach1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bankstownwatertower.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Well, if no evidence is forthcoming we cannot be sure that PD-1923 or anything apply. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is claiming this image is "own work", but given the description "Construction of Bankstown Reservoir. 1919.", the "own work" claim isn't credible. Whpq (talk) 13:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, image is in public domain per {{PD-US-1923}} and {{PD-Australia}}. I have updated the licencing, however, the source and author needs updating. Flickerd (talk) 13:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Where is the evidence of publication in 1919?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ℯ xplicit 06:42, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The description states that the picture shows the Construction of Bankstown Reservoir. 1919. There is no source, but the section Bankstown Reservoir#Construction states that construction began in 1918 and the infobox suggests that the construction was completed in 1920, so the year should be approximately correct (provided that the picture shows the correct building).

Given the age, the picture should be in the public domain in Australia.

The tag {{PD-US-1923}} implies publication before 1923, but since no source was provided, there is no way to prove that it was published before 1923. Even if it was not published until later, it could be in the public domain in the United States for some other reason. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Meganesia, where did you get the file from?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:00, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Malcolm Glazer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. czar 01:20, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Although the subject of this photo is now dead, he only died four years ago and wasn't exactly a recluse while he was alive, so I don't think it's unreasonable to expect that someone somewhere took a photo of him that they'd be willing to upload here under a free licence. – Pee Jay 10:04, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is an acceptable fair use image of a deceased person. The image was uploaded two years after he died and now, two years later, a free image has not been found, making it reasonably likely not to be found. If a free image is found and uploaded to Wikipedia, then it should replace this image. Aspects (talk) 18:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep not replaceable since the subject is dead and no free images exist. Waiting for hypothetical copyright owners to show up is not a reasonable expectation. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:43, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Universal Orlando Globe.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 June 8. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:51, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Universal Orlando Globe.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Caledon Mueseum in Smithfield.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image is not being used in any article, so maybe it shouldn't have been uploaded to Wikipedia (perhaps WikiMedia was a better place). Also, the uploader hasn't been active since 2015. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:17, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1977 Ford Pinto Cruising Wagon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These orphaned files were uploaded by Barnstarbob with the claim that they were published before 1978 without a copyright notice. This user was the subject of a copyright investigation at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Barnstarbob and numerous files were deleted. A few, including these, apparently got overlooked when the case was closed in 2013.

I've been unable to verify the claimed copyright status of these files. Given the user's history, these files should probably be deleted as unfree. The other files at Category:File at CCI by Barnstarbob should be investigated as well. clpo13_(talk) 22:50, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 02:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.