Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 January 8

< January 7	January 9 >

January 8

File:AugustaSchools.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of presumably copyrighted banner. Also low quality and unused. Ixfd64 (talk) 05:50, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:49, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Oogum Boogum Song - Brenton Wood.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#1 failure, a free version exists. No prejudice to restoration if the article is significantly expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth -FASTILY 00:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This picture sleeve is part of the French single (discogs, eBay) of an American-made song performed by an American singer. I uploaded a side-A label of the US release as free in Commons. This puts the French sleeve's compliance with WP:NFCC into question, especially WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. George Ho (talk) 07:56, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep file; I disagree with side label uploader's preference. A second image does not prima facie violate policy, but even if it did, then the newly-added side label is the image that needs to go. - JGabbard (talk) 02:18, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As said before, c:File:Oogum Boogum Song by Brenton Wood (US vinyl, side A).png is stored in Commons... unless you think it's not eligible for Commons. Commons has the "Nominate for deletion" tool. George Ho (talk) 02:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder whether this discussion will be different from or similar to the other FFD discussion. George Ho (talk) 02:53, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CellsPastoris.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:CellsPastoris.png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:56, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, mislabelled non-free file per my comments on Commons. I don't believe it could be used under fair use if converted either. Salavat (talk) 05:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dublin University Seal.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are we sure this drawing of the seal dates before 1927? Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:06, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AroSphereOfInfluence.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:AroSphereOfInfluence.png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Final Fantasy XI - Original Soundtrack mix.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More about the tracks themselves than about the music of Final Fantasy XI as a whole. Insufficiently supported by critical commentary in context; may fail WP:NFCC#8. George Ho (talk) 17:18, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Cover arts in music of Final Fantasy I and II

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete File:All Sounds of Final Fantasy I·II front cover.jpg & File:Symphonic Suite Final Fantasy cover.jpg -FASTILY 00:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More than one cover art used, which may be against WP:NFC#UUI and WP:NFCC#3a. One shall be kept. Either All Sounds (1989) or Original Soundtrack (2002) would do. I would prefer the 2002 soundtrack cover, but I'm unsure whether it illustrates the article subject in context more than All Sounds, which came first before the rest. Maybe All Sounds by default if there's no consensus on either one. In other words, ditch the Symphonic Suite and go for either one. George Ho (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.