Jump to content

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 July 15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files

< July 14	July 16 >

July 15

File:Rani or Pari (Reena Kapoor).jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:33, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rani or Pari (Reena Kapoor).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Sourced to "www.indiantvtoday.com at Google Images". Doesn't look like this has a CC license as claimed and upload has a history of ignoring copyright. Eeekster (talk) 06:50, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Sanatan Dharma Vidyalaya - main building.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Sanatan Dharma Vidyalaya - main building.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

See this. The timestamp on the page is certainly of an earlier date than that of upload. Lovy Singhal (talk) 06:55, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Osmo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:34, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Osmo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is clearly marked "© Jack Lenk". The uploader, User:Merrydef, has claimed that it is his/her own work. It is possible that Merrydef and Jack Lenk are one and the same, but this is not clear. In any case, should an image uploaded under Creative Commons be marked with a copyright symbol? Bazonka (talk) 14:29, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Raghaveshwarabharathi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raghaveshwarabharathi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Upload statement says "author is my friend...and I have permission to use this on wiki". Incompatible with the license mentioned. —SpacemanSpiff 14:45, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Linganamakki dam.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Linganamakki dam.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Upload statement "Author Thirumalesh J has given me full permission to use the photograph wherever I want" is incompatible with the listed license. —SpacemanSpiff 14:48, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Honnemaradu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Honnemaradu.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Upload statement "Author Thirumalesh J has given me full permission to use the photograph wherever I want. " is incompatible with the listed license. —SpacemanSpiff 14:49, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cell assembly with stress permeation specimen John Bockris et al.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cell assembly with stress permeation specimen John Bockris et al.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

The e-mail quoted on this web site only says that authors may use their own works. It is not clear if any licence has been given to anyone else, or if that licence is sufficient. Besides, the e-mail has been placed on the file information page instead of being sent to OTRS. If the uploader has permission, the permission should be sent to OTRS, see WP:CONSENT for instructions. Stefan2 (talk) 15:06, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Blood Donor (3rd Class) badge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:23, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blood Donor (3rd Class) badge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The badge seems to be Commons:Template:PD-RU-exempt but see Commons:COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet: the photo is unlicensed. Stefan2 (talk) 15:23, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Photograph was taken by me. Andrei.smolnikov (talk) 00:23, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Albatross (Big Wreck album).jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete as unsourced. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:53, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albatross (Big Wreck album).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tagged with {{subst:orfurrev}} but I'm not entirely certain that this tag applies, since this is an overwritten file. The old file (uploaded by User:DavidOaks) was tagged as {{PD-US}} (which is a free licence), but has no source. Additionally, no date of creation or publication has been indicated. The current version (uploaded by User:MatthewGoodfan101) can be kept. Stefan2 (talk) 15:44, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HUNAU-wordmark.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HUNAU-wordmark.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

It is dubious if this really is ineligible for copyright due to the shadows. Stefan2 (talk) 16:30, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Miran and his trumpet.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miran and his trumpet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Listed as identical to hr:Datoteka:252460 165486463516672 115958345136151 406546 4506034 n.jpg. The Croatian image was deleted for the reason "Nepropisno postavljena datoteka, istekao rok za popravak" (no idea what it means). No Commons file name is mentioned, so I take it that it was deleted from Croatian Wikipedia for some other reason, possibly meaning that the image is unfree. The Croatian Wikipedia file name is a typical Facebook file name, so it is possible that the image is a copyvio from Facebook. Stefan2 (talk) 18:45, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Drvored at Ritam Europe 2 Festival in Zagreb, Croatia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drvored at Ritam Europe 2 Festival in Zagreb, Croatia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Same issue as the above, except that the Croatian Wikipedia file name is different: hr:Datoteka:581045 346191205446196 115958345136151 70764826 2063853373 n.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 18:45, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Frederic Lanz - accordion, vocals.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frederic Lanz - accordion, vocals.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Same uploader as the above. If the other two images are unfree, this might also be unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 18:46, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kevin Clash.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kevin Clash.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Free licence on Flickr, but it also says "Evidence: The license statement can be found online at: https://www.facebook.com/groups/NASATweetupAlumni/permalink/500309533319270/?comment_id=500321089984781&notif_t=like^{[dead link‍]}" The Facebook link suggests that the image might come from Facebook (so the Flickr user might not be the original source), but since the Facebook link doesn't work (it requires some password), it isn't possible to see what kind of permission the Facebook page might be hiding. Stefan2 (talk) 19:07, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Soviet badge blood donor 2nd class.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soviet badge blood donor 2nd class.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The badge seems to be Commons:Template:PD-RU-exempt but see Commons:COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet: the photo is unlicensed. Stefan2 (talk) 19:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
:The photo is on the internet, but it is my photo. Andrei.smolnikov (talk) 01:42, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The Rev. Phillip W. Dennis II.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Rev. Phillip W. Dennis II.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

See [1]: permission to reproduce, but unclear if there is permission to modify. Licences which don't allow derivative works are unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 19:11, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I do have an interest in the file not being deleted but I consider this a nuisance that is not worth my time to protest. I am frankly starting to regret having made any contribution to Wikipedia since I didn't realize I would have to get involved with rules lawyers. As every American knows, Sears Portrait Studio is a retail chain that does not use professionally trained photographers. They charge very little for the portraits, which do not have any artistic or editorial value--and therefore no monetary value beyond the sitting fee and prints. They know this, and their customers know this, which is why they provide the boilerplate release that they do. The whole point is that they don't care what you do with the pictures once they have collected the initial fees. If anyone doesn't understand this or cannot distinguish between the letter and spirit of the law, and thinks things would be improved by deleting the photo, be my guest. After being henpecked like this, I am no longer intersted in participating in any discussion or work here. Pwdennis2 (talk) 20:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Wait, I noticed one thing. It says that it is a photo of Rev. Phillip W. Dennis II, and the uploader's user name is User:Pwdennis2. Uploader, is this a photo of yourself, taken at a professional photo studio in the United States? How does US copyright law work here? Isn't there some part of it which says that the copyright belongs to the one who pays for the photo in cases like this, as it would count as a work for hire? --Stefan2 (talk) 20:23, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Planting Field Arboretum; LoC (3b34890rloc).jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:3b34890rloc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No evidence that this was published before 1923. The Library of Congress[2] lists no date. The photographer died in 1952, so this could have been created after 1922. The Library of Congress tells that there are "no known restrictions on publication", but this seems to be a standard statement listed for almost all images regardless of whether they are free or not. The image is from the "Johnston (Frances Benjamin) Collection"[3]. It says that "Images in the collection span the period, 1850-1949, but the majority date between 1897 and 1927." Thus, it could be either pre-1923 or post-1922. Stefan2 (talk) 19:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I really hope you're wrong, especially when you consider the fact that this was a DYK image. ----DanTD (talk) 21:36, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The file was moved from File:3b34890rloc.jpg to File:Planting Field Arboretum; LoC (3b34890rloc).jpg by Morning Sunshine (talk · contribs) at 03:48, 19 July 2012 (UTC). AnomieBOT⚡ 05:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It should also be noted that this file was tagged for a move to the commons by User:Svenbot before being tagged for renaming, let alone deletion. ----DanTD (talk) 13:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Painting by Raymond C Watson.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Painting by Raymond C Watson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photo of a painting. The painting is most likely still under copyright. Eeekster (talk) 21:17, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2012_July_15&oldid=1075922396"