Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/AMK152
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Final (1/5/1) ended 02:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
AMK152 (talk · contribs) – I (AMK152) have been a Wikipedian since December 2, 2005. Since then I have been contributing to SpongeBob, Full House, LEGO, Hot Wheels, Year in Film, Years, Events by Months, and other articles. I have reverted a lot of vandalism, and have improved articles by creating templates, improved a few disamb. pages, redirect pages, categories, and others. I am a member of four Wikiprojects, 2 of which I contribute to the most. (Lego and SpongeBob) In addition, I plan to work on more articles/categories/redirects/etc. to help improve Wikipedia. AMK152 02:08, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
- I accept the nomination. -AMK152 02:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support
- Strong Support ForestH2
- Oppose
- Definitely not. Malformed RFA nom, fails too much of my criteria. User does not need to be an admin. NSLE 02:34, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose I don't oppose on malformed noms, but there is no need for tools. Yanksox (talk) 02:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- O zero AfD participation, very few WP:space edits outside of the wikipediholic test etc., bad answers to 1 and 3. - CrazyRussian talk/email 02:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note, candidate changed his reponse to Q1. NSLE 02:45, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Ay carramba! Still bad. - CrazyRussian talk/email 02:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note, candidate changed his reponse to Q1. NSLE 02:45, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Per above. *~Daniel~* 02:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose, needs to learn the basics. Almost never uses edit summaries, does not seem to know how to use the preview feature and lacks WP space edits. I'm also somewhat concerned about lack of diversity. May make a good admin in the future, but not now. --Ezeu 02:53, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral
- Neutral
- Neutral I suggest you withdraw your RfA and try again at a later date, as the oppose votes could pile on and I'd hate to see you become jaded and stop editing as you seem to be a good person to have editing on Wikipedia. Perhaps check out some of the recent successful RfA's to get a general idea of what the community is looking for in an admin candidate hoopydinkConas tá tú? 02:53, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, and I agree to your advice. I am going to withdraw. -AMK152 02:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- See AMK152's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool.
- Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
- A: I plan on looking over speedy deletion candidates, and seeing if it needs to be deleted or not, then proceeding on to do what is best for it (delete or not). Also, I plan to delete copyrighted images that shouldn'y be on Wikipedia. And deleting categories that are useless,a nd improving other categories.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A: There are many articles I am pleased of. First off, I have edited and improve, and still Continue to improve the SpongeBob articles. I joined the SpongeBob Wikiproject, and created a template for easy access to all SpongeBob episode pages. Secondly, I started to add descriptions to the Full House episodes, in which a page for each season listed the episodes. Lastly, I have improved the LEGO articles, by formatting them and I even created the Lego Template, which makes it easier for people to access the Lego articles. I am please of these accomplishments because I want to make things easier for people to find, as well as something to find (ex. episode descriptions).
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A:There have been a few disputes, in which have been solved or are in the process of being solved. (Such as Bikini Bottom history section and List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes octopi-person dispute (see talk)) I used the talk pages to try and settle it. I will deal with it in the future, by just simply settling the situation on the talk page, and/or in the Wikiproject.
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.