Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/U-Two
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
FINAL (0/1/0); Withdrawn prematurely by User:EVula 20:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
U-Two (talk · contribs) - I'd like to nominate myself for the role of admin. I have has been a wikipedian for over two years now. I am quite active and have made a ton of edits and original contributions to many articles. It would be nice to be able to help people out more often and handle trivial problems. U-Two 20:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
- A: Various...
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: The most important thing i can offer as an admin is the high standard quality of articles and contunuing this policy
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: Uh, Some...
General comments
[edit]- Links for U-Two: U-Two (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/U-Two before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]Hi, U-Two, I strongly urge you to withdraw this RFA as your experience on Wikipedia is so minimal that there is no chance of you're getting adminship. Your negligible effort to answer the questions only digs the hole deeper.
--Richard 20:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Oppose
- Oppose Edit count isn't enough to really evaluate; this is really bad. I also suggest you withdraw.--Chaser - T 20:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.