Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkusership/Peterdownunder

Add links
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peterdownunder

[change source]
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship, request for bureaucratship, request for checkusership, or request for oversightship. Please do not modify it.
Peterdownunder (talk · contribs)


RfCU of Peterdownunder
global contribs · pie chart · edit count · list user · blocklog ·contribs · deleted blocks · protects · deletes · moves · rights
Last comment by: ShakespeareFan00.

End date: 03:06, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 3 October 2010 (UTC)


I am nominating Peterdownunder (talk • changes • e-mail • blocks • protections • deletions • moves • right changes) for the position of checkuser. Peter has many unique qualities that lend to wards him becoming a good checkuser. Firstly, he is very active, and often at a time when no current CU is active. Peter is also a mature man with a mature man's wisdom and mind. He deals with young children every day and does a great deal to volunteer for not only the global village but also his local community. Peter has done an awful lot of reading up about checkuser, IP technology and things like proxies as well ask asking many questions showing a quick learning curve. He has the support of both myself and I am sure the other checkusers will be there to answer any questions in the interim period all new checkusers experience when we start. Please consider him for the position. fr33kman 02:58, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: I accept the nomination --Peterdownunder (talk) 03:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From Jon@talk:~$

Q What is Network Address Translation? Jon@talk:~$ 07:33, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: Network Address Translation or NAT is a method that allows a large number of IP addresses on one network to use a single IP address on another network. This is done through a router or some broadband modems. It can be used as part of a firewall and security. It is also used by a number of companies and ISP's to limit the number of "real" IP addresses that they need.

It is different to a proxy server which needs to be configured on an individual computer. NAT is "invisible", so an individual user may not be aware that it is being used. Some routers use dynamic NAT, which means that an individual computer could connect to another network using a pool of different IP addresses each time it is used. It is called translation because the NAT router "translates" the individual computer's IP address to one provided by the router.--Peterdownunder (talk) 12:50, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support

[change source]
  1. Strong support fr33kman 03:03, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Strong support - Peter is one of the most trustworthy people I know around here. Yottie =talk= 14:02, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support πr2 (talk • changes) 20:02, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Of course. Great editor, not much to say here. SimonKSK 21:34, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. sonia♫ 22:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Trusted and has the skill. James (T C) 03:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. He's a very good editor and is trusted with Oversight. --Bsadowski1(Talk/Changes) 03:42, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Strong Support. His gentle, peaceful kindness and trustworthy decisions have always been much treasured in simple wikipedia. I know for sure he'll do very well as a checkuser. :) Genially, Belle tête-à-tête 05:58, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Not much to say here. Peter has my complete trust. He's a great article writer, admin and oversighter. His time zone is another good thing, so we can cover the whole day. Peter is the perfect candidate. -Barras (talk) 07:56, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Trusted editor, should do well. Pmlineditor ∞ 08:29, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  11. A highly respected, mature, and intelligent editor who has discretion and knowledge in this area. :) He has my full and confident support. —Clementina talk 08:39, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. See no reason why not, trustworthy. -DJSasso (talk) 10:34, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Same reason as I put for Djsasso.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 11:06, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Trusted, active, and needed for that time slot. Griffinofwales (talk) 22:19, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  15. As per Griffinofwales. Kansan (talk) 22:22, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Jon@talk:~$ 02:14, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  17. per Kansan Purplebackpack89 04:33, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  18. -- Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 12:53, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  19. —I-20the highway 22:14, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  20. wiooiw (talk) 19:04, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  21. —§ stay (sic)! 12:26, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Exert 22:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Chenzw  Talk  13:31, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Battleaxe9872 文/ テ 14:15, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support --vector ^_^ (talk) 07:22, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

[change source]

Comments

[change source]
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkusership/Peterdownunder&oldid=8894943"