Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Panairjdde (2nd)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Panairjdde

Evidence

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Panairjdde, as well as 151.44.82.159 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and 151.44.81.169 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) among other ranges within 151.44.*.* such as 151.44.36.230 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and in the range 151.47.*.* such as 151.47.126.70 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). This user is constantly removing the usage of "AD" (Anno Domini) from articles, ignoring the fact that WP:DATE does not have anything that says that they should be removed. When articles contain dates that are both BC and AD (or BCE and CE), they are both supposed to be used. Ryūlóng 02:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the entirety of 151.44.0.0 can be utilized by this vandal. Ryūlóng 02:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Both 151.44. & 151.47. are assigned to Infostrada Internet, based in in Milan Italy. I suspect that Infostrada has a DHCP pool, so blocking those two ranges means that we are also blocking on the order of 130,000 Italians from contributing to en.wikipedia. -- llywrch 22:11, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That explains why he's focusing on subjects within southern europe/roman catholicism. Ryūlóng 22:25, 25 July 2006(UTC)

Right, and Ethiopia is Southern Europe/Roman Catholicism! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.44.91.151 (talk • contribs)

When I didn't answer on your talk page at Montanism, I never thought you would make yourself the bane of this project over it! ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 23:08, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I have nothing against you. It is llywrch that I put the blame on.--151.47.87.229 00:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New username: CodexVaticanus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) obviously now impersonating you, Codex Sitaiticus, to push his agenda. Ryūlóng 23:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I simply run out of names. Did not mean to insult anyone, particulary my old "friend" CS. Take it as an homage.--151.47.87.229 00:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

Don't forget User:Ahrarara. --ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 02:36, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that User:Ahrarara was included in the first one, which is why I did not add it. However, if you believe that the name should be included, then by all means, add him/her. Ryūlóng 02:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recently, Brunetti (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) commented on my talk page, as he was obviously the same editor. Ryūlóng 20:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked Brunetti. Same language, same obsessions, only now with cyberstalking & 3RR violations (e.g, Mark 6). Sigh. -- llywrch 22:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should blame yourself, you started all of this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.44.91.151 (talk • contribs)

I am talking to this user now. He has been a user since 2002, a productive contributor since 2004. He shouldn't be going through and making all these format changes against consensus and the Manual of Style (ArbCom decision), but this is remediable, and I'm not sure he has done anything else except perhaps make a few snide comments. —Centrx→talk • 00:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And the related ban evasions. —Centrx→talk • 05:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts have been blocked by other admins. Iola k ana|^T 14:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]