Talk:De Havilland Canada DHC-5 Buffalo
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the De Havilland Canada DHC-5 Buffalo article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comments
[edit]I dispute the word "conversion" in the description of the Buffalo. It wasn't a straight conversion, it was a whole new plane. New tail design, bigger wing, etc.
Landing inside a Baseball field
[edit]Does anyone have details about the time a DHC-5 Buffalo landed inside a baseball stadium (possibly Yankee Stadium in NY) and took off again. I saw the video years ago but am unable to find any info on this event on the Web.Hudicourt 16:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Well I guess it was just my memory playing games with me..... I was never able to find anyone who knew or had seen this video.74.15.138.27 (talk) 14:31, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Take Off and Landing Distances
[edit]Does anybody know the DHC- 5's take off and landing distances. The article mentions that it is a STOL aircraft. 2.120.5.170 (talk) 10:55, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- The publication de Havilland Canada: DHC-5A Buffalo STOL Tactical Transport, page 6. de Havilland Canada, May 1971 claims take-off and landing distances of 2,100 ft (640 m). I will add this. - Ahunt (talk) 14:12, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- It depends on the weight - Jane's 1982–83 (as used in the specifications) gives a take-off run of 2300 ft and a landing distance of 850 ft at MTOW (49200 lb) which drops to 950 ft and 550 ft with a 12,000 lb payload (compared at 18000 lb at MTOW).Nigel Ish (talk) 15:38, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- The company data says that 2100 feet is at 49,200 lbs for take-off and 46,900 for landing and those numbers are to and from a 50 ft obstacle. At 41,000 lbs take-off and 39,100 for landing the landing over a 50 ft obstacle becomes 1210 ft and the landing 980 ft. - Ahunt (talk) 16:09, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- It depends on the weight - Jane's 1982–83 (as used in the specifications) gives a take-off run of 2300 ft and a landing distance of 850 ft at MTOW (49200 lb) which drops to 950 ft and 550 ft with a 12,000 lb payload (compared at 18000 lb at MTOW).Nigel Ish (talk) 15:38, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use Canadian English
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class Canadian military history articles
- Canadian military history task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class aviation articles
- Start-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- C-Class Ontario articles
- Low-importance Ontario articles
- C-Class British Columbia articles
- Low-importance British Columbia articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages