Jump to content

Talk:List of Mario educational games

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article name

[edit]

"Mario educational games" would be a better name IMO. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 09:42, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's preferable to follow such articles as "LCD games in The Legend of Zelda series". - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:39, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why? These Mario games come from different developers, have different gameplays and don't follow a common continuity. "Mario" as referred to here is more of a license than a series. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 22:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why does having multiple developers matter in the slightest? - A Link to the Past (talk) 23:17, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Split

[edit]

I suggest strongly that we split this into seperate articles again, because these are completely different games with different gameplay and developers and are not like remakes or different versions of the same game. All individual games deserve their own articles, so why were they merged in the first place?76.83.246.11 (talk) 21:08, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because only, MAYBE one game in this list is notable enough for its own article, and that's a strong maybe. The mere act of being a separate game does not warrant a separate article. - A Link to the Past (talk) 21:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weegee

[edit]

According to a Youtube Account known as "Knowyourmeme", it said the source of the popular internet meme, "Weegee" is from the game called "Mario is Missing". Should we add in information about the Weegee meme. 81.157.249.157 (talk) 17:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I Think Weegee is a good subject matter, and could make a good page (personally) --Sandbag for smash bros 4 (talk) 07:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Is Missing! and Encyclopedia correlation

[edit]

The Mario Is Missing! game can actually be completed with the help of some Encyclopedia books.Me and my brother completed it that way in the 90's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nourishlarament (talkcontribs) 01:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Artifacts in the NES version of Mario is Missing!

[edit]

I can't find anywhere on the internet a list of artifacts in the NES version of Mario is Missing!. The only one regarding a list of artifacts I could find is the one for the SNES version. Can someone give me a list of artifacts in the NES version, please? 2600:6C51:7001:400:B961:52EE:4F5F:44D9 (talk) 01:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a forum or discussion board. Don't use it like one please. ~ P*h3i (talk to me) 08:45, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should Mario is Missing! get its own page?

[edit]

I feel like Mario is Missing! is notable enough to get its own Wikipedia page, similarly to Mario's Time Machine. I'll make a stub one for it if there aren't any objections. ~ P*h3i (talk to me) 08:47, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some sources which should be helpful.  AJFU  (talk) 17:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sources
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Mario educational games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:55, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Mario is Missing! which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]