Talk:Pushpawati River

India: Uttarakhand / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttarakhand (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move

This page needs to be moved to Pushpawati River because river pages are sufixed 'River' as per standard Wikipedia practice. - Chandan Guha (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is not standard Wikipedia practice. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers#Naming. In fact the general rule on naming articles is that we use the name most commonly recognised in English. Google searching indicates that this is "River Pushpawati", which is way ahead of both "Pushpawati River" and "Pushpawati". JamesBWatson (talk) 13:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - Chandan Guha (talk) 01:13, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Puspavati.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Puspavati.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:25, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 March 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Procedural close. Superseded by multiple move discussion at Talk:Alaknanda River. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 12:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pushpawati River → Pushpawati – Primary topic, no ambiguous page of the same name exists, qualifies as per, WP:2DABPRIMARY. Hemant Dabral^Talk 23:19, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request. OhKayeSierra (talk) 02:13, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Even if no ambiguous page exists, is the name unadorned the common name in English for these rivers? It doesn't matter if nothing else is at the base title if "XYZ River" is still the best title. Maybe best for a full RM? Snowfire (talk) 01:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also qualifies as per WP:CONSISTENT, with other rivers that have "river" dropped in their titles i.e. Ramganga, Yamuna, Sarayu, Nandakini, Ganges etc. — Hemant Dabral^Talk 09:18, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Alaknanda River which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:01, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]