User talk:Ergo Sum/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

St. Patrick's

"The corporate name and official website name of the external link is simply Archdiocese of New York" . Thant's fine your web site but what I'm trying to do with the wiki page is make all of the cathedral pages consistent with one another, i.e., on the "External Links section", "Official Cathedral Site" first, "Roman Catholic Archdiocese/Diocese of..." second. Check it out. -Roberto221

@Roberto221 I appreciate your efforts to standardize the terminology of various facets of cathedral articles. However, I think it is necessary to bring to your attention that I am neither the owner nor operator of the website, nor am I affiliated with St. Patrick's Cathedral or the Archdiocese of New York. Therefore, it would be incorrect to designate said website (located in the External links section) as "mine." Nonetheless, I find it only logical that if both the website's proper and colloquial names (as well as the name under which the legal entity was incorporated in New York) are Archdiocese of New York, its link should be represented as such, rather than as an alternate name. Ergo Sum 23:54, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:Infobox school

Hi. Before making unilateral changes, you may wish to discuss your proposals first with the stakeholders or with user talk:Kanguole. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

@Kudpung Not to sound impolite, but I have no idea as to what you're referring. Could you please elucidate? Ergo Sum 17:15, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Sorry. What I meant was, you'd get more response to your suggestion if you post at the schools project or at user talk:Kanguole. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:42, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying. I could hardly count my recommendation that the NRHP template be embedded into the school template as unilateral, seeing as no action was actually taken. I also see no reason for why the infobox school template talk page is not the proper place to list such a comment. However, I will duplicate it where you suggest if you think it would yield more fruitful results. Ergo Sum 02:37, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

@Kudpung But I am also a bit confused about why you list the Southern California task force of WikiProject California as the stakeholder of the infobox schools template. In my opinion, that seems like a rather unusual statement. Ergo Sum 02:45, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Typo: the shortcut for the school's project is WT:WPSCH, the one I erroneously typed was WT:WPSC. Sorry again for the confusion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks again for clarifying. Ergo Sum 03:20, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Jay Heritage Center, 1838 Peter Augustus Jay House and Jay Estate (also known as Jay Property)

Dear Ergo Sum, Thanks for your interest in the Jay Heritage Center, the 1838 Peter Augustus Jay House and the Jay Estate (also known as Jay Property). We are grateful for your efforts to make our Wikipedia presence more accessible especially since the history we are preserving is so important! The Jay Heritage Center, the 1838 Peter Augustus Jay House and the Jay Estate (also known as Jay Property)are all 3 very different things but related to each other like Russian nesting dolls. JHC is a non-profit that owns the 1838 Peter Augustus Jay House and its surrounding .75 acres outright (as well as an additional non-Jay related 1907 Carriage House and .75 acres around it). The 1838 Jay Mansion which is notable for its outstanding Greek Revival architecture and history was not John Jay's house but was built on the footprint of Jay's original home, a 1745 farmhouse called "The Locusts"; pieces of the 1745 house were incorporated into the 1838 structure. The house lies within the Jay Estate landscape (23 acres in entirety) which is notable for being the land that John Jay grew up upon with its original viewshed towards Long Island Sound (immortalized in a prominent Guy Pene Du Bois mural); the land itself also has the highest archaeological importance. This 23 acre parcel of land and everything on it is also operated and maintained by JHC even though JHC does not own all of it. That is why they all have separate Wikipedia entries. It is a unique relationship and to our knowledge the only configuration of its kind among New York State historic sites as JHC is not "friends" group but rather a distinct entity with both ownership rights and operating responsibilities. Hope this is helpful. I can understand why you might suggest merging the sites but that would likely confuse these legal distinctions that have taken many years to clarify. Given your interest in NY History and the law, it would be a pleasure to have you come visit us! - Minard38 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minard38 (talk • contribs) 12:09, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

PS We believe our organization does meet Wikipedia's notability standards - so does NY State Governor Andrew Cuomo who in addition to adding permanent NY State Path Through History signage on the parkways for the Jay Heritage Center in May 2014 has awarded JHC not one but two preservation grants totaling $891,056 in just the last 9 months Minard38 (talk) 12:33, 5 September 2015 (UTC)Minard38

Please see my response on the 1838 Peter Augustus Jay House talk page. Ergo Sum 18:26, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Georgetown School of Dentistry

appreciate your contributions to school of dentistry and details about it on the Georgetown page, but should it be listed on the university template and the table of constituent schools of the university if it is defunct? looking at templates and tables of different schools don't show any similar uses. I'm not sure but I think school of dentistry should probably be taken off them. Jx242 (talk) 01:03, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

My logic for including it as I did was because the Dental School was a rather long-lived school that turned out many graduates and had a notable impact on the university. Additionally, I followed Yale's example, which lists their defunct school in their list of schools and on their template. The table on the Georgetown University article is not necessarily comprehensive only of existing schools, so I think it would be prudent to include the defunct one as well. Ergo Sum 03:37, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Granted, I can understand removing it from the table, as that implies it is an active school. However, I do believe it should remain in the template. Ergo Sum 03:39, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (William Matthews (priest)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating William Matthews (priest), Ergo Sum!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks OK. I've added two sources from Google Books. I think you may want to check the claim that he was the first American-born president since although it appears in a book it depends very much on what you call "American" - are we discounting anyone in Florida or Texas or Louisiana or California? Especially since he wasn't "American-born" but born a British citizen? I've changed it to "British North American" which seems more plausible to me but I think this might need more checking.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for reviewing the page. I've clarified the language in the article to more accurately reflect the claim. Ergo Sum 19:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Incidentally, having read this recently, this sounds like it might be an interesting framework to expand the article from, although he isn't mentioned in the article. Blythwood (talk) 18:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

@Blythwood: From my own knowledge of that situation (I happen to have read rather extensively about the early university and state of Maryland), Matthews was affiliated with Georgetown before that particular sale occurred and during his presidency, while the Maryland Jesuits did own plantations on which there were slaves (and presumably some of the proceeds from those helped fund the college), I am not aware of any formal connection between slave ownership and the university that early on. It would be interesting if you did happen to find something to that effect, though. Ergo Sum 20:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of William Matthews (priest)

Hello! Your submission of William Matthews (priest) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 18:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Issue addressed. Ergo Sum 19:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK for William Matthews (priest)

On 1 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Matthews (priest), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Matthews (priest). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, William Matthews (priest)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Allen3 ^talk 00:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 06:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Ergo Sum, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Lord Roem ~ (talk) 20:07, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Cafe Junczion

Dear Sir,

I am very new to Wikipedia. As you know English is not my mother tongue I might make mistake. I really appreciate you time taken to review my article and suggest me on few edits. I kindly request you to please guide me to edit the mistakes which you have found in the article.

Looking forward for your reply.

Thanks and Regards,

IssacIssacpanicker007 (talk) 21:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Issacpanicker007 (talk) 21:18, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

@Issacpanicker007: Welcome to Wikipedia! We're glad to have your help. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but there are certain policies that all articles are required to abide by. As you can see, I've placed several notices on Cafe Junczion that signify to other editors that there are several issues with the newly created article. One of those policies is notability: for an article to be created, its subject must meet certain community-determined standards of public notability. In my opinion and in 78.26's (an administrator's) opinion, Cafe Junczion failed to meet those criteria. Please do not be discouraged just because one of the articles you created was deleted. It happens to the best of us. I would highly recommend familiarizing yourself with the Wikipedia policies and, by all means, continue editing. The best practice for learning the guidelines is by doing. Ergo Sum 21:30, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi Issacpanicker007. I'm sorry your early Wikipedia experience is frustrating. We do have policies about what makes a topic encyclopedic, as Ergo Sum mentioned your article didn't come close to meeting the notability guidelines. If you've read them, and you feel your topic is notable and you want to give it a go, may I suggest you follow the suggestions at WP:Your First Article, using the Draft space and Articles for Creation? That will allow you to develop your article without worrying about it getting deleted. If you have any further questions there are lots of editors willing to help you understand this place, which is unquestionably complicated at times. All the best, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 00:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Thawabit

Hi. I see you added the POV tag in Thawabit, but left nothing on the talk page to justify its addition. Why? Al-Andalusi (talk) 22:28, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

@Al-Andalusi: Please see my response at Talk:Thawabit#NPOV tag. Ergo Sum 23:24, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ovidio Lari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fabbrica. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Ergo Sum. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:30, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Editing News #3—2016

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter • Subscribe or unsubscribe on the English Wikipedia

Did you know?

Did you know that you can easily re-arrange columns and rows in the visual editor?

Select a cell in the column or row that you want to move. Click the arrow at the start of that row or column to open the dropdown menu (shown). Choose either "Move before" or "Move after" to move the column, or "Move above" or "Move below" to move the row.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has mainly worked on a new wikitext editor. They have also released some small features and the new map editing tool. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the list of work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, releasing the 2017 wikitext editor as a beta feature, and improving language support.

Recent changes

• You can now set text as small or big.[1]
• Invisible templates have been shown as a puzzle icon. Now, the name of the invisible template is displayed next to the puzzle icon.[2] A similar feature will display the first part of hidden HTML comments.[3]
• Categories are displayed at the bottom of each page. If you click on the categories, the dialog for editing categories will open.[4]
• At many wikis, you can now add maps to pages. Go to the Insert menu and choose the "Maps" item. The Discovery department are adding more features to this area, like geoshapes. You can read more on MediaWiki.org.[5]
• The "Save" button now says "Save page" when you create a page, and "Save changes" when you change an existing page.[6] In the future, the "Save page" button will say "Publish page". This will affect both the visual and wikitext editing systems. More information is available on Meta.
• Image galleries now use a visual mode for editing. You can see thumbnails of the images, add new files, remove unwanted images, rearrange the images by dragging and dropping, and add captions for each image. Use the "Options" tab to set the gallery's display mode, image sizes, and add a title for the gallery.[7]

Future changes

The visual editor will be offered to all editors at the remaining 10 "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next month. The developers want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect several languages, including Thai, Burmese and Aramaic.

The team is working on a modern wikitext editor. The 2017 wikitext editor will look like the visual editor and be able to use the citoid service and other modern tools. This new editing system may become available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices in October 2016. You can read about this project in a general status update on the Wikimedia mailing list.

Let's work together

Do you teach new editors how to use the visual editor? Did you help set up the Citoid automatic reference feature for your wiki? Have you written or imported TemplateData for your most important citation templates? Would you be willing to help new editors and small communities with the visual editor? Please sign up for the new VisualEditor Community Taskforce.

If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Ergo Sum,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ergo Sum. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter

Hello Ergo Sum,

Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have 805 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.

Mid July to 01 Oct 2016

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .

Venice location maps

1km
0.6miles

St. Mark's Basilica

  

Magic!

It looks like technology has overtaken me while I was dragging my heels on the request you made at the map workshop a few months ago. Try out using the fantastic new {{OSM Location map}} template. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe Roe (talk • contribs)

@Joe Roe: Thanks for working on the request and also pointing out that new feature. I wasn't aware of it. Ergo Sum 22:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

New Page Review - newsletter #2

Hello Ergo Sum,

Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE

• Improve the tools: Vote here.
• Reduce your review load: Vote here

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .

Westchester

Hi Ergosum,

While I normally prefer customizable templates to single images, it appears {{Photomontage}} has no ability to display even spaces between images of irregular sizes and thus a single image would be aesthetically preferable. This is typical across many Wikipedia locality articles, and this one is of so little edit and viewing traffic (and thus the image rarely changes) that one image should be fine. As is typical in these situations, I can send you or others the easily-editable PSD file. ɱ (talk) · vbm · coi) 23:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ɱ (talk) · vbm · coi) 23:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Editing News #1—2017

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Did you know?

Did you know that you can review your changes visually?

When you are finished editing the page, type your edit summary and then choose "Review your changes".

In visual mode, you will see additions, removals, new links, and formatting highlighted. Other changes, such as changing the size of an image, are described in notes on the side.

Click the toggle button to switch between visual and wikitext diffs.

The wikitext diff is the same diff tool that is used in the wikitext editors and in the page history.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has spent most of their time supporting the 2017 wikitext editor mode which is available inside the visual editor as a Beta Feature, and adding the new visual diff tool. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, supporting the 2017 wikitext editor as a beta feature, and improving the visual diff tool.

Recent changes

A new wikitext editing mode is available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices. The 2017 wikitext editor has the same toolbar as the visual editor and can use the citoid service and other modern tools. Go to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures to enable the ⧼Visualeditor-preference-newwikitexteditor-label⧽.

A new visual diff tool is available in VisualEditor's visual mode. You can toggle between wikitext and visual diffs. More features will be added to this later. In the future, this tool may be integrated into other MediaWiki components. [8]

The team have added multi-column support for lists of footnotes. The <references /> block can automatically display long lists of references in columns on wide screens. This makes footnotes easier to read. You can request multi-column support for your wiki. [9]

Other changes:

• You can now use your web browser's function to switch typing direction in the new wikitext mode. This is particularly helpful for RTL language users like Urdu or Hebrew who have to write JavaScript or CSS. You can use Command+Shift+X or Control+Shift+X to trigger this. [10]
• The way to switch between the visual editing mode and the wikitext editing mode is now consistent. There is a drop-down menu that shows the two options. This is now the same in desktop and mobile web editing, and inside things that embed editing, such as Flow. [11]
• The Categories item has been moved to the top of the Page options menu (from clicking on the icon) for quicker access. [12] There is also now a "Templates used on this page" feature there. [13]
• You can now create <chem> tags (sometimes used as <ce>) for chemical formulas inside the visual editor. [14]
• Tables can be set as collapsed or un-collapsed. [15]
• The Special character menu now includes characters for Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics and angle quotation marks (‹› and ⟨⟩) . The team thanks the volunteer developer, Tpt. [16]
• A bug caused some section edit conflicts to blank the rest of the page. This has been fixed. The team are sorry for the disruption. [17]
• There is a new keyboard shortcut for citations: Control+Shift+K on a PC, or Command+Shift+K on a Mac. It is based on the keyboard shortcut for making links, which is Control+K on a PC or Command+K on a Mac. [18]

Future changes

• The VisualEditor team is working with the Community Tech team on a syntax highlighting tool. It will highlight matching pairs of <ref> tags and other types of wikitext syntax. You will be able to turn it on and off. It will first become available in VisualEditor's built-in wikitext mode, maybe late in 2017. [19]
• The kind of button used to Show preview, Show changes, and finish an edit will change in all WMF-supported wikitext editors. The new buttons will use OOjs UI. The buttons will be larger, brighter, and easier to read. The labels will remain the same. You can test the new button by editing a page and adding &ooui=1 to the end of the URL, like this: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Project:Sandbox?action=edit&ooui=1 The old appearance will no longer be possible, even with local CSS changes. [20]
• The outdated 2006 wikitext editor will be removed later this year. It is used by approximately 0.03% of active editors. See a list of editing tools on mediawiki.org if you are uncertain which one you use. [21]

If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! User:Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Irish Fright

Ergo Sum, please return as soon as possible to your review here; there has been a response to your most recent comment, and it looks like it could be ready for approval. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:48, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

RM closures

Just as an FYI, typically an uninvolved editor closes the RM. Since you didn't actually !vote but did propose it above, it would probably just be better to formalize the !vote. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:18, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

@TonyBallioni: Yeah, I realized that afterwards. That's why I removed the discussion closing templates. Also, since this would be a technical move, only an admin can actually execute the consensus. Ergo Sum 02:50, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

People with the extended mover bit can as well. Not applicable here because you're involved, but there is also nothing against non-admins without that technical to right suppress redirects closing an RM they are uninvolved with. They'd just need to post to WP:RM/TR when they did it. Same as when any non-admin closes an RM that is move protected. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:57, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Angelo De Donatis

Hello! Your submission of Angelo De Donatis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. FYI, you should use this symbol: {{y}} as a check mark when responding on a DYK nomination. The green tick is used by the reviewer to inform the DYK bot that the article is approved. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Got it. Thanks for the heads up. Ergo Sum 23:27, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Angelo De Donatis

On 2 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Angelo De Donatis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Angelo De Donatis is the first non-cardinal to be appointed Vicar General of Rome since the sixteenth century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Angelo De Donatis. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Angelo De Donatis), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Great job writing Angelo De Donatis and promoting it to the Main Page! Its rare to see this level of article quality in DYK. Look forward to seeing more articles from you! MX (✉ • ✎) 00:16, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

A Message

Hi. How are you?

I thought I would write this message to say that from the Armonk, New York Article, Armonk is not a Hamlet but a Census Designated Place (CDP). (How you can tell by this is by viewing the Municipalities and Communities of Westchester County Chart at the end of the Article).

Please keep in mind to be of good faith. I didn't mean to be of a disruption.

Warm regards,

[User:Sarah.t.life]] Sarah.t.life (talk) 00:15, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello Sarah.t.life. Thank you for the tip, though I was aware of that. Why do you mention it? Did I inadvertently make an edit to the contrary? Ergo Sum 01:37, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi @ErgoSum: Why, your very welcome. Ohh! So you were aware of that before, then why do you keep reverting it? I assume so, yes, you may have.

User:Sarah.t.life

Sarah.t.life (talk) 22:21, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

@Sarah.t.life: I'm pretty sure I've never reverted any of your edits on the Armonk, New York article. Can you link to a particular edit so I know what exactly you're referring to? Ergo Sum 01:05, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

@Ergo Sum: How can you do that actually? (My apologies, I was never taught that method of inputting).

User:Sarah.t.life

Sarah.t.life (talk) 00:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

@Sarah.t.life: On the Armonk, New York article, if you click "View history" on top, then select two consecutive versions using the blue dots, then click the "compare selected revisions" button. Then you can just copy the URL in the browser bar.Ergo Sum 01:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Ohh! My sincerest apologies! I believe I have mistaken you for another User about these reverts. (You can disregard these messages that I have inserted in this section).

User:Sarah.t.life

Sarah.t.life (talk) 02:27, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi

Moved to Getting this article to GA then FA

 –  —አቤል ዳዊት^?(Janweh64) (talk) 04:35, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your help desk questions

You didn't get a response, but maybe you could try asking again. This isn't something I would know how to help with. Or have you tried WP:VPT?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:10, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

@Vchimpanzee: I've tried on the Village pump to no avail. I might try again on the help desk, but it doesn't seem like there are many who know the answer to this question. Ergo Sum 02:13, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Did you ever get help for your October 7 question?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

@Vchimpanzee: No, I didn't. I posted it again at the Help Desk a few days ago, but there was no response. Ergo Sum 21:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Georgetown International Relations Association logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Georgetown International Relations Association logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ergo Sum. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Please give your expert advice

Hi. I noticed that you are interested in law. Can you please take a look at this discussion about Reid Collins & Tsai article? I would appreciate your expert advice on the subject. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 13:59, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Guardia Lombardi

On 17 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Guardia Lombardi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Guardia Lombardi. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Guardia Lombardi), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 04:22, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Template Editor

Somehow you didn't get the standard message, so I'll take the liberty of pasting this...

Your account has been granted the "templateeditor" user permission, allowing you to edit templates and modules that have been protected with template protection. It also allows you to bypass the title blacklist, giving you the ability to create and edit editnotices. Before you use this user right, please read Wikipedia:Template editor and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on wise template editing and the criteria for revocation.

You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.

This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

Useful links

• All template-protected pages
• User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable – outstanding template-protected edit requests (bot-generated)
• Request fully-protected templates or modules be downgraded to template protection

Happy template editing! Cabayi (talk) 16:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

As far as I'm aware you're the first to have the permission on a trial basis. It may help you to work on template changes in which you have no personal interest other than ensuring a successful change. You can find the list of template edit requests at User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable, and the templates which require some work prior to deletion or merger at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Holding cell. After a couple I'm sure you'll see my reasons for declining a couple of your requests was not about agreement or disagreement, merely a desire to make sure nothing breaks as a result of the change.

A while back I took a stab at describing what makes a good edit request at User:Cabayi/Making effective template edit requests. If you have any ideas for improving the essay please edit away. I'd really appreciate it.

RexxS offered to act as a sounding-board if you have any problems/questions. I'd like to echo that. Good luck & best wishes, Cabayi (talk) 16:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

@Cabayi and RexxS: Many thanks for your offer to lend your advice when necessary. You've both been helpful in the past with acquainting myself with the norms and technical matters of edit requests alike. Ergo Sum 19:22, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Pecorino di Carmasciano

On 24 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pecorino di Carmasciano, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Pecorino di Carmasciano cheese is produced only in a small cluster of towns in the Apennine Mountains of Italy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pecorino di Carmasciano. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Pecorino di Carmasciano), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:47, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Infobox school proposed updates

Hi, I think it would be ok for you to go ahead and implement my proposed updates to the two existing parameters in {{Infobox school}}. Its been 5/6 days since I last proposed the updates on the talk page and there is support after posting on WPSCH talk page. Steven (Editor) (talk) 18:29, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Done. Ergo Sum 18:46, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Editing News #1—2018

Read this in another language • Subscription list for the English Wikipedia • Subscription list for the multilingual edition

Did you know?

Did you know that you can now use the visual diff tool on any page?

Sometimes, it is hard to see important changes in a wikitext diff. This screenshot of a wikitext diff (click to enlarge) shows that the paragraphs have been rearranged, but it does not highlight the removal of a word or the addition of a new sentence.

If you enable the Beta Feature for "⧼visualeditor-preference-visualdiffpage-label⧽", you will have a new option. It will give you a new box at the top of every diff page. This box will let you choose either diff system on any edit.

Click the toggle button to switch between visual and wikitext diffs.

In the visual diff, additions, removals, new links, and formatting changes will be highlighted. Other changes, such as changing the size of an image, are described in notes on the side.

This screenshot shows the same edit as the wikitext diff. The visual diff highlights the removal of one word and the addition of a new sentence. An arrow indicates that the paragraph changed location.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has spent most of their time supporting the 2017 wikitext editor mode, which is available inside the visual editor as a Beta Feature, and improving the visual diff tool. Their work board is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, supporting the 2017 wikitext editor, and improving the visual diff tool.

Recent changes

• The 2017 wikitext editor is available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices. It has the same toolbar as the visual editor and can use the citoid service and other modern tools. The team have been comparing the performance of different editing environments. They have studied how long it takes to open the page and start typing. The study uses data for more than one million edits during December and January. Some changes have been made to improve the speed of the 2017 wikitext editor and the visual editor. Recently, the 2017 wikitext editor opened fastest for most edits, and the 2010 WikiEditor was fastest for some edits. More information will be posted at mw:Contributors/Projects/Editing performance.
• The visual diff tool was developed for the visual editor. It is now available to all users of the visual editor and the 2017 wikitext editor. When you review your changes, you can toggle between wikitext and visual diffs. You can also enable the new Beta Feature for "Visual diffs". The Beta Feature lets you use the visual diff tool to view other people's edits on page histories and Special:RecentChanges. [22]
• Wikitext syntax highlighting is available as a Beta Feature for both the 2017 wikitext editor and the 2010 wikitext editor. [23]
• The citoid service automatically translates URLs, DOIs, ISBNs, and PubMed id numbers into wikitext citation templates. This tool has been used at the English Wikipedia for a long time. It is very popular and useful to editors, although it can be tricky for admins to set up. Other wikis can have this service, too. Please read the instructions. You can ask the team to help you enable citoid at your wiki.

Let's work together

• The team is planning a presentation about editing tools for an upcoming Wikimedia Foundation metrics and activities meeting.
• Wikibooks, Wikiversity, and other communities may have the visual editor made available by default to contributors. If your community wants this, then please contact Dan Garry.
• The <references /> block can automatically display long lists of references in columns on wide screens. This makes footnotes easier to read. This has already been enabled at the English Wikipedia. If you want columns for a long list of footnotes on this wiki, you can use either <references /> or the plain (no parameters) {{reflist}} template. If you edit a different wiki, you can request multi-column support for your wiki. [24]
• If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly. We will notify you when the next issue is ready for translation. Thank you!

—User:Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 23:14, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Episcopal Seminary of Fiesole

Hello! Your submission of Episcopal Seminary of Fiesole at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Episcopal Seminary of Fiesole

On 12 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Episcopal Seminary of Fiesole, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Episcopal Seminary of Fiesole, formed after the Council of Trent, was unusually influenced by the Society of Jesus? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Episcopal Seminary of Fiesole. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Episcopal Seminary of Fiesole), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Church of Santa Maria Primerana

On 13 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Church of Santa Maria Primerana, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Church of Santa Maria Primerana. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Church of Santa Maria Primerana), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 02:47, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Upcoming changes to wikitext parsing

Hello,

There will be some changes to the way wikitext is parsed during the next few weeks. It will affect all namespaces. You can see a list of pages that may display incorrectly at Special:LintErrors. Since most of the easy problems have already been solved at the English Wikipedia, I am specifically contacting tech-savvy editors such as yourself with this one-time message, in the hope that you will be able to investigate the remaining high-priority pages during the next month.

There are approximately 10,000 articles (and many more non-article pages) with high-priority errors. The most important ones are the articles with misnested tags and table problems. Some of these involve templates, such as infoboxes, or the way the template is used in the article. In some cases, the "error" is a minor, unimportant difference in the visual appearance. In other cases, the results are undesirable. You can see a before-and-after comparison of any article by adding ?action=parsermigration-edit to the end of a link, like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Foss?action=parsermigration-edit (which shows a difference in how {{infobox ship}} is parsed).

If you are interested in helping with this project, please see Wikipedia:Linter. There are also some basic instructions (and links to even more information) at https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-ambassadors/2018-April/001836.html You can also leave a note at WT:Linter if you have questions.

Thank you for all the good things you do for the English Wikipedia. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:18, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William Matthews (priest)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Matthews (priest) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Farang Rak Tham -- Farang Rak Tham (talk) 12:21, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK approved. Do I need to do anything else?

Hello Ergo Sum! Thanks for reviewing the Low-key photography nomination for DYK. It might sound stupid, but since this is my first article I nominated for GA and DYK, do I need to do anything else? Robertgombos (talk) 19:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

(watching:) Robertgombos, no, nothing you have to do, just keep the nomination watched, to see when it will be closed to go to a preparation area, and then watch Template:Did you know/Queue. You'll get credit on your talk when it appears (usually at some midnight UTC). Enjoy! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:45, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Oh, fair enough, thanks Gerda Arendt! Robertgombos (talk) 20:14, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Template:Infobox United States federal court

I have to say you're doing a fantastic job with the template. If I may, I have a few requests:

1. Can you add a parameter for the title of the "chief judges" in the infobox. For example, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation does not have a chief judge, but a "chairman", so having a blanket label on chief judges would not be accurate. This request only applies to tribunals.
2. For the court abbreviation in legal citations parameter, can you not have the parentheses appear if no abbreviation is input? The United States Alien Terrorist Removal Court, for example, does not have a known case citation label, and thus, the parentheses appear for no reason.

I appreciate your work on this template, and if possible, am willing to assist you in its implementation across pages. – JocularJellyfish ^Talk_Contribs 00:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

@JocularJellyfish: Thanks! 1) Yes, that's a good idea; I've implemented that. 2) United States Alien Terrorist Removal Court currently uses {{Infobox U.S. federal court}}, which is different from {{Infobox United States federal court}} (I know the two are easily mistaken at the moment). The empty parentheses do not appear in Infobox United States federal court. Once the TfD is closed, I intend to make Infobox U.S. federal court a redirect and then do a round robin page move. Ergo Sum 01:04, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

@Ergo Sum: Thanks for your collaboration on this template. – JocularJellyfish ^Talk_Contribs 16:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William Matthews (priest)

The article William Matthews (priest) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:William Matthews (priest) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Farang Rak Tham -- Farang Rak Tham (talk) 07:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

William Matthews

Re the FAC, I think it kind of just timed out. Look forward to its renomination post the GA review. Ceoil (talk) 20:45, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

@Ceoil: That's probably the case. The article is in the GA nomination process right now, so I'll let that finish up and account for any suggestions, at which point I'll give FAC another go. Ergo Sum 22:31, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

In my view, you are down to formatting issues now, and wish you the best of luck. Ceoil (talk) 01:13, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

@Ceoil: Thank you. Hopefully you'll weigh in when I re-propose as FAC. Ergo Sum 02:46, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

You fell down on the page numbers thing last time. Will give another read over but ping me when ready. Ceoil (talk) 06:06, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

@Ceoil: Just got around to cleaning up the article and re-nominating. If you have a moment, I'd appreciate you weighing in on the FAC. Ergo Sum 19:02, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

@Ceoil: Again, if you have a moment and feel like weighing in on the FAC, it would be very appreciated. Ergo Sum 14:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William Matthews (priest)

The article William Matthews (priest) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Matthews (priest) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Farang Rak Tham -- Farang Rak Tham (talk) 11:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Andrea L. Thompson

On 3 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Andrea L. Thompson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Andrea L. Thompson served in the United States Army for 28 years before becoming National Security Advisor to the Vice President? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Andrea L. Thompson. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Andrea L. Thompson), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dahlgren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dahlgren Chapel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Phelps Memorial Hospital logo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

"Notable people" section at Full Sail University

Resolved

Hello! I am reaching out to you as an active editor and member of WikiProject Universities. I've been working with Full Sail University to suggest improvements to the Wikipedia article on its talk page (where I've also disclosed my COI). I've proposed adding a sourced list of notable alumni, similar to other university articles. However, I've struggled to get a volunteer editor to review and implement the proposed markup. Would you be willing to take a look at the sourced list of people here and update the article appropriately? Thanks for your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 18:13, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

This request has been answered. Take care! Inkian Jason (talk) 17:41, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Old North Building

On 13 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Old North Building, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Old North, built between 1794 and 1797, is the oldest standing academic building on Georgetown University's campus? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Old North Building. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Old North Building), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

William Matthews (priest)

@Baffle gab1978: Thank you for copy editing. Ergo Sum 23:10, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

No worries, it's an interesting article. Good luck with your planned FA nom. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 02:15, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Re: Our Lady of Pompeii Church (Manhattan)

Thanks for your work on this article! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:06, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

@Another Believer: You're welcome! It was a pleasure to work on. Fascinating history. Ergo Sum 17:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

I'm curious, do you have plans to nominate the article for Good status? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:33, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Yes, that's precisely what I intend. There are just a few more things I want to add to the article, and then I'm going to nominate it. Ergo Sum 18:42, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Like ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:59, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

@Another Believer: I've created the good article nomination. I'd appreciate it if you could weigh in with your thoughts when you have a moment. Ergo Sum 23:14, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

I don't conduct GA reviews, but I'll take another look at the article. Again, great work! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

@Ergo Sum: I also noticed this article, and it looks like it's in great shape. Good luck with your GA nomination. epicgenius (talk) 18:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

@Epicgenius: Thank you. As I say above, if you feel comfortable weighing in on the GA nomination, even if not to start it, I'd appreciate it. Ergo Sum 23:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Sanctuary of San Gerardo Maiella

On 16 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sanctuary of San Gerardo Maiella, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that around one million pilgrims visit the Sanctuary of San Gerardo Maiella in Materdomini, Italy, each year? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sanctuary of San Gerardo Maiella. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sanctuary of San Gerardo Maiella), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)