User talk:Insomniac186

Hi!

Welcome!

Hello, Insomniac186, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Regarding Southern Pacific 2472, it looks to me like the text you reinserted is from the Golden Gate Museum website. As such, it's probably copyrighted by them. You can use their material as a basis for writing an article but not verbatim, without explicit permission. Do you have that permission? If not, try writing the information in your own words and just cite them. I've reverted your changes, please don't take it personally.

Hope that helps! ++Lar: t/c 23:05, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hello. Please remember to always provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy editing. Gamaliel 00:00, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Undergone

The article Undergone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not truly meet the expectations of WP:MUSIC. No listing at Allmusic. Appearances on the Warped tour were local one-shots. Not signed to a major label or a notable indie label. No albums or tracks charting. No evidence of any significant coverage. References limited to their own Myspace, YouTube, and Twitter pages. None of which are acceptable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DarkAudit (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Undergone

I have nominated Undergone, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Undergone. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DarkAudit (talk) 19:59, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Southern Pacific 9010 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Southern Pacific 9010 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Pacific 9010 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nightfury 11:18, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Apparel 2000 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apparel 2000 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apparel 2000 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 16:52, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Southern Pacific 4450 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Southern Pacific 4450 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Pacific 4450 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Southern Pacific 6051 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Southern Pacific 6051 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Pacific 6051 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 01:20, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Southern Pacific 5623 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Southern Pacific 5623 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Pacific 5623 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Southern Pacific 4450

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Southern Pacific 4450 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Pacific 4450. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TarnishedPath^talk 07:33, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Southern Pacific 3100 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Southern Pacific 3100 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Pacific 3100 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TarnishedPath^talk 00:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of preserved Southern Pacific Railroad rolling stock

The article List of preserved Southern Pacific Railroad rolling stock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article had sources for citations, but only 60% of the article has citations, which means that 40% of the article has no citations. This article also fails GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

14.2.34.249 (talk) 02:10, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of preserved Southern Pacific Railroad rolling stock

A tag has been placed on List of preserved Southern Pacific Railroad rolling stock requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This article had sources for citations, but only 60% of the article has citations, which means that 40% of the article has no citations. This article also fails WP:GNG

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 14.200.225.254 (talk) 07:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Krauss-Maffei ML 4000

The article Krauss-Maffei ML 4000 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Most of the article has no citations. This article relies on only two sources in different sections. The history section has no sources, The original buyers section has no sources. The camera car section has no sources, and the preservation section has no sources. Therefore, this article fails GNG. This article needs to be fleshed out with proper sourcing in order for it to meet GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 120.21.204.65 (talk) 04:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]