User talk:Ssaisushanth45

Welcome, Ssaisushanth45!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ssaisushanth45! I'm Ozzie10aaaa, and I've been assigned as your mentor. About half of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From Ssaisushanth45: I am an employee or affiliate of ATMECS Global, and I am working to create or improve the article about the company. I aim to follow Wikipedia's guidelines for neutrality and verifiability. I welcome feedback and edits from the Wikipedia community.

Question

Hi Ssaisushanth45, please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Paid-contribution_disclosure, do not hesitate to ask further questions, thank you --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:28, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, Ssaisushanth45. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. A page you created ATMECS Global has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject."Before you start writing, gather a list of indisputably reliable sources that are entirely independent of the [subject] and that devote significant coverage to the [subject]. Once you have that list of high quality sources, format them into references. Referencing for beginners explains how. Now, neutrally summarize what the sources say, avoiding any promotional language. You can find much more detailed advice at Your first article." --per Cullen328" Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. It applies to any topic, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources and Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.You can ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk and on IRC chat Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

This notice is information dense. Please carefully read and thoroughly understand the linked information before attempting further article creation.

🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 13:40, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response! I have disclosed any conflict of interest by noting that I'm an employee of the company. Can you please help me identify any portion of the article that appears promotional or guide me to get this page published. I have edited multiple pages that seem to understand the guidelines shared. Ssaisushanth45 (talk) 13:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you carefully read most of the content above? If so, let me point out particular parts where it is promotional, although most of it is very promotional, so I recommend you to read WP:ADS, User:Deepfriedokra/promo to understand more about why the language that you used are considered promotional.

- Introduction

- Specialty Practices

- Services

I will draftify your article for now, but I do hope when I come back, you will have addressed most of the problems, though I would highly recommend you to edit anything beside it for several months to understand more about Wikipedia's policies. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 13:40, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ATMECS Global moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to ATMECS Global. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ATMECS Global (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tesleemah were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article does not appear to meet the notability guideline, also it appears to read like a PROMO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ATMECS Global and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tesleemah (talk) 17:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ssaisushanth45! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tesleemah (talk) 17:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ATMECS Global Official Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ATMECS Global Official Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 13:05, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Minorax. The image was part of an article/wiki page that has been moved into draft mode for corrections. Will be uploaded again within the next 7 days. 117.254.37.187 (talk) 13:18, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ATMECS Global (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources are a mix of routine business reporting, press releases, and churnalism, none of which contributes towards notability per WP:NCORP. The whole thing is basically a corporate brochure or presentation, written from the company's point of view, and as such is purely promotional. We have zero interest in what the business wants to tell the world about itself, we almost exclusively want to know what independent and reliable third parties have said about it and what makes it worthy of note.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ATMECS Global and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:41, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ATMECS Global (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ATMECS Global and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:45, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks KylieTastic. I had about 11 references which were rejected by previous reviewers so I brought it down to two. I had used another privately held company as a benchmark which also has similar such references. I'm confused about this "damned if you do, damned if you don't" scenario. Would appreciate any guidance you could provide, please. Thanks.

Kumar, Kaushal. "We transform an Idea into a Product, reveals Ravi Velagapudi, CEO of ATMECS". The CEO Magazine India. Retrieved 2024-11-15

"ATMECS - Offering Cloud and Big Data Solutions by Virtue of In- House R&D". www.ciotechoutlook.com. Retrieved 2024-11-15.

"ATMECS Inc: Automating Testing Frameworks". CIOReview. Retrieved 2024-11-15.

"ATMECS: Trusted Partner in Managing Emerging IT Challenges" (PDF).

"ATMECS: The Cloud Technology Accelerators". CIOReview. Retrieved 2024-11-15.

Inc, ATMECS. "ATMECS, Inc. Awarded Google Services Partner Distinction". www.prnewswire.com. Retrieved 2024-11-15. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)

"ATMECS Join Hands With Insurity To Rapidly Implement Cloud-Based Solutions By CIOTechOutlook Team". www.ciotechoutlook.com. Retrieved 2024-11-15.

"ATMECS Global Accelerates AI Innovation by Joining the NVIDIA Partner Network as Solution Advisor Consultant". https://www.businesswire.com/. May 06, 2024 09:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); External link in |website= (help)

"ATMECS GenAI Hackathon 2024: A Grand Finale Like No Other". Outlook India. 2024-10-26. Retrieved 2024-11-15.

"AI-driven health and aerospace solutions bag top honours at Hyderabad hackathon". The Economic Times. 2024-10-31. ISSN 0013-0389. Retrieved 2024-11-15.

Bureau, The Hindu (2024-10-25). "GenAI Hackathon 2024 finale on October 26- 27". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 2024-11-15. {{cite news}}: |last= has generic name (help) Ssaisushanth45 (talk) 13:53, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). So the first thing is to identify 3+ such sources to show nobility. Keep away from PR, paid promos, or any that have substantial interviews etc as all are not independent. Note that all key claims need to be sourced - most of yours are not. Lastly we are looking for encyclopedic content not things that read like averts: lists of Specialty Practices and Services is what a marketing department wants but is not an encyclopedic article. I haven't looked at all the above sources but prnewswire.com and .businesswire.com are just PR so not helpful. Hope that helps explain things a bit. KylieTastic (talk) 14:51, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]