Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Network-based rating models in sports

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker ^talk 18:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Network-based rating models in sports

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems more like a literature review than a proper article. The notability of this subject isn't established by third-party sources, and none of these rating models are used by leagues or the media. The only references are the three research papers that the article is summarizing plus a fourth research paper cited in one of the three. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:16, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think the topic has merit and so should be rewritten rather than deleted entirely — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.186.250 (talk) 16:44, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:06, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.