Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Po Sum On

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2012 January 6.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The arguments for deletion are stronger than the arguments for retention given. --MuZemike 03:55, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Po Sum On

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to me to be a nonnotable product. There are dozens, if not hundreds, of liniments available. Maybe this could be replaced with a redirect or merge with a Chinese medicine page. The page was previously PRODed by me, but there was an objection. Kerowyn ^{Leave a note} 21:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are hundreds of liniments available, but few have been in production for over 100 years. Not surprisingly we also have the similar Tiger balm, Vicks VapoRub & Bag Balm too. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:37, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If you want to get it merged, propose merging, and no deletion. pluma Ø 22:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability is not established by third-party sources; age ≠ notability.Novangelis (talk) 15:11, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This product is not notable, and in fact I'm stunned that this page, which is essentially an advertisement for the product, has managed to survive on Wikipedia for this long - if this was a new page I'd consider tagging it for G11. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:47, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.