Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puttshack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Puttshack

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. No coverage past PR agencies and routine announcement. Award is not major duffbeerforme (talk) 03:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the page was deleted last week at RfD as it was not found suitable as a redirect to Oakbrook Center. Jay 💬 06:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Lots of press surrounding location openings but nothing that really covers WP:CORPDEPTH. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Award winning company which can be redirected to Topgolf. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How are they related? Topgolf founders are partners in starting Puttshack. Topgolf has only a See also entry for Puttshack currently. Jay 💬 22:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~@Jay:~~, nothing in WP:NCORP allows for notability simply for winning an award. Are there any references meeting WP:ORGCRIT that you found. Let me know as I may have missed some in my search. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CNMall41, I think you meant to ping Jax 0677. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:58, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did. Thanks for the courtesy ping. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The Forbes article outlines big plans for expansion, but at the moment it seems to be still TOOSOON to be notable.--Gronk Oz (talk) 08:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for clearly failing WP:CORPDEPTH. The only keep vote frankly does not make sense and should be ignored (keep the page as it could be redirected to an unrelated company). --Cavarrone 12:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.