Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates
Welcome to In the news. Please read the guidelines. Admin instructions are here. |
In the news toolbox |
---|
This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.
This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.
view — page history — related changes — edit |
Glossary
All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality. Nomination steps
The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.
Headers
Voicing an opinion on an itemFormat your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated. Please do...
Please do not...
Suggesting updatesThere are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:
|
Archives
Archives of posted stories: Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives
September 19
September 19, 2024
(Thursday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Arts and culture
Disasters and accidents
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Sports
|
September 18
September 18, 2024
(Wednesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Law and crime
Science and technology |
UN demands Israeli withdrawl from Palestine
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: The United Nations General Assembly votes 124–12 to demand Israel end its occupation of Palestinian territories within 12 months. (Post)
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:
- Nominated by GeorgeMemulous (talk · give credit)
- Wait until a separate article be created. Rynoip (talk) 21:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Meaningless unless either Israel withdraws or someone enforces the decision. For now, nothing actually changes. Noah, BSBATalk 22:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose the ICJ ruling was one thing, and a Security Council resolution would be another, but GA resolutions are non-binding - they usually hold little weight and rarely hold long-term significance. In addition, this doesn’t really change anything; the position of the UN on the OPT and Israeli occupation has been stated/reaffirmed repeatedly in the past, this is just doing so again. Only real unique significance is this being the first time Palestine itself has introduced the resolution, but I don’t think that meets the bar for ITN. The Kip (contribs) 23:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also worth noting there's no distinct article yet, and the currently-listed target is a poor fit. The Kip (contribs) 03:52, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose it's non binding, so per The Kip, is going to have little impact. Masem (t) 23:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A non-binding resolution seems meaningless. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 23:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's non-binding, and already covered by Ongoing. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 02:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support regardless of the UN's ability to enforce the decision, it is still a UN resolution. Scuba 02:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per The Kip, the ruling won't be enforced or recognized by the powers engaged in said occupation so its a bit of a moot point. Dozens of UN Resolutions pass regularly, many with regards to ongoing conflicts or international situations. Ornithoptera (talk) 06:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
RD: Salvatore Schillaci
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Il Post, BBC, La Gazzetta dello Sport, La Stampa
Credits:
- Nominated by Oltrepier (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Nicopicchio (talk · give credit), Nick.mon (talk · give credit), PeeJay (talk · give credit) and Diademchild (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
A former professional footballer and full international for Italy; he was best known for winning both the Golden Ball and the Golden Boot at the 1990 FIFA World Cup and finishing second at the Ballon d'Or of the same year. Rest in peace. Oltrepier (talk) 09:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Needs a little work need some citations for career statistics otherwise pretty good, rip. 2407:E400:D004:BA01:41B9:4789:E394:2B10 (talk) 09:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
September 17
September 17, 2024
(Tuesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
Science and technology
Sports
|
RD: JD Souther
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Variety, LA Times
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:E924:4E1B:C314:5996 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Johndavies837 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
American singer-songwriter. 240F:7A:6253:1:E924:4E1B:C314:5996 (talk) 04:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Some WP:PROSELINE issues prevent this from being posted on the main page. Bremps... 06:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
RD: Tyrone C. Fahner
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Chicago Tribune
Credits:
- Nominated by TDKR Chicago 101 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Article updated and well sourced. Death announced on this date. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 23:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article seems sufficient in terms of covering his life and well-cited. Bremps... 03:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) 2024 Lebanon pager explosions
Blurb: Across Lebanon and Syria, pagers used by Hezbollah explode, killing multiple people and injuring thousands. (Post)
Alternative blurb: At least nine people are killed and over 2,800 are injured after pagers used by Hezbollah members explode in Lebanon.
Alternative blurb II: At least nine people are killed and over 2,800 are injured after pagers used by Hezbollah members explode in Lebanon and Damascus, Syria.
News source(s): Guardian, NYT
Credits:
- Nominated by Sandstein (talk · give credit)
- Created by Galamore (talk · give credit)
Novel and creative escalation in the Israel-Hezbollah conflict (which is not in ongoing, unlike the Israel-Hamas conflict). Sandstein 17:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Actually was just creating a nom for this, added my proposed blurb as an alt.--Sunshineisles2 (talk) 17:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- I left out the estimated casualty numbers because these are prone to change in the days to come. Sandstein 17:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- I was under the impression that this falls under ongoing Israel-Hamas war? Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present) started one day after and in direct response to the conflict in Gaza and Hezbollah has made calm with Israel conditional on a ceasefire in Gaza[1].VR (Please ping on reply) 17:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- If for some reason the two are separate, then Israel–Hezbollah conflict should be added to ongoing too, which would make this blurb redundant.VR (Please ping on reply) 17:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- In a broader sense both Israel–Hamas war and Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present) are theatres of the regional conflict between Iran, Israel and their respective allies, but currently we have only Israel–Hamas war in ongoing. Sandstein 17:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The novelty and notability on this escalation are salient. Even if there were an ongoing (and there is not) I'd likely still lean towards supporting a blurb given the singularity of this event. Kcmastrpc (talk) 17:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Support An interesting topic, as well as the blurb. Also this event can be considered as a biggest security breach, more than a month after the Assassination of Ismail Haniyeh. --cyrfaw (talk) 17:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – The sentence reads like Hezbollah triggered the explosions. Should we add "due to a security breach"? FunLater (talk) 17:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- The expulsions are really a security breach similar to the one that occurred in Iran last month. The blurb should be improved further since the organization has nothing to do with her --cyrfaw (talk) 17:59, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, covered by ongoing the Israel-Hezbollah conflict is considered part of the Israel-Hamas conflict per our articles. (we just had a nom that considered making it a separate ongoing but that didn't gain traction). It is a separate theater but it's very much tied to what's happening in the Gaza strip. Masem (t) 17:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
It's more tied to what's happening in Netanyahu's mind.(Strike as Netanyahu's mind is no longer "ongoing"...) Martinevans123 (talk) 20:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support – Major suspected attack in Lebanon with nearly 3,000 injuries, a major escalation in the reignited Hezbollah–Israel conflict. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 18:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Though it can be argued that it's covered by ongoing, I think it is a very serious and rare escalation notable enough of a blurb. Prodrummer619 (talk) 18:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support. While covered by the ongoing item, this is sufficiently unique and the number of casualties (double digits deaths apparently now and thousands of injuries) merits posting. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Almost incredible. Netanyahu coincidentally Tweeted about withdrawal of Israeli civilians from the North yesterday? Martinevans123 (talk) 20:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support not only is it a big escalation, but the way Israel did so is crazy. Scuba 20:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Patar knight, somewhat covered by ongoing but unusual/escalatory enough it probably merits posting. The Kip (contribs) 20:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support an important news and widely covered.
- Wait The article has a rainbow of multiple cleanup/dispute tags. And the technical details of the incident(s) still seem uncertain and subject to much speculation. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality issues for now.VR (Please ping on reply) 22:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wait and oppose Hezbollah mention - The page clearly still needs cleanup and the situation is developing. Many of those caught in the attacks do not seem to have a clear connection to Hezbollah, so while this may have been intended to target members of that organisation it could also have been a more general terrorist attack against pager users in the country (with Hezbollah happening to be a major user of pagers in the country) and it is not only misleading but potentially dangerous to jump the gun in making assumptions here. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 22:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- 'Support. Large number of casualties. The news is making international headlines. – Anne drew
- Support on notability sheer scale of injuries together with the highly unusual tactics deployed makes this notable. Cleanup tags need to be addressed first before posting. FlipandFlopped ツ 23:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wait, then Support Page needs a bit of clean-up and development. Other than that, this is unique and is significant enough to exclude it from the "covered by ongoing" argument in my opinion. This type of attack has never been seen on such a massive scale, and the damages could be tremendous. Hungry403 (talk) 02:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Front-page news across the world. Noah, BSBATalk 02:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Immediate Support Should be up for tomorrow. Alexysun (talk) 02:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- oppose per masem. unless there is something bigger out of this in retaliation.
- Also the article ays lebanon and the blurb says syria.Sportsnut24 (talk) 03:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- oppose per masem. unless there is something bigger out of this in retaliation.
- Support - unusual event, global coverage. Significant per Hungry403. Mjroots (talk) 05:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Posted. I find that there is a WP:ROUGHCONSENSUS to post, and that the articles, while they could use improvement, are nevertheless serviceable. El_C 05:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- There is a tag on there that held up posts for Fujimori. So why does this get through?Sportsnut24 (talk) 08:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Sportsnut24: the article is tag-free, as it was when I added my support at 05:34. Mjroots (talk) 09:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Mjroots @El C, as evidenced by the talk page, it still has several outstanding POV issues. The tag was removed prematurely.VR (Please ping on reply) 12:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Sportsnut24: the article is tag-free, as it was when I added my support at 05:34. Mjroots (talk) 09:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- @El C Change the title to mention communication devices in general instead of just pagers per the recent developments. Reuters Prodrummer619 (talk) 15:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Briefly because I'm writing in haste. I stand by my decision and am not pulling the blurb. Any other requests can be handled by any other admin. Thank you. El_C 23:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- There is a tag on there that held up posts for Fujimori. So why does this get through?Sportsnut24 (talk) 08:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- NOTE there is a big orange tag on the article, which is this allowed on the page? It should be pulled until sorted, like fujimori.2A00:F3C:A282:0:5097:3DB:7890:50B7 (talk) 06:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- This is a contentious topic and so has all the usual aggravation and issues that they generate. The article still has a big orange {{POV}} tag, just like it did when I commented above. And the technical scope of of the topic has expanded since as it's not just pagers.
- As this is obviously part of the general Arab-Israeli conflict, we should perhaps leave all such to Ongoing.
- Andrew🐉(talk) 06:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
September 16
September 16, 2024
(Monday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
Typhoon Bebinca (2024)
Blurb: Typhoon Bebinca becomes the strongest typhoon to hit China since Typhoon Gloria of 1949. (Post)
News source(s): [2]
Credits:
- Nominated by High Admiral JMT (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Nominator's comments: Not much strong feelings about this one, but since it is said to be strongest typhoon to hit Shanghai since 1949, maybe we should post it? High Admiral JMT (talk) 02:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose We generally don't post items of this nature. Blurbs here tend to be concerned with impact rather than storm strength.
- Noah, BSBATalk 02:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Good faith nom, but this is mostly a trivia. The impact caused by the typhoon isn't notable enough for the ITN. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 03:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as trivial. The Kip (contribs) 03:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Otis Davis
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NBC Sports
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by TDKR Chicago 101 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Article updated and well sourced. Death announced on this date. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 23:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support as said above, the article is good and has no issues. Rynoip (talk) 23:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yeah, article seems to be comprehensive and cited. We can post this. Bremps... 05:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support American double champion in track at the 1960 Olympics; he was 92. InedibleHulk (talk) 07:13, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above -- good article. UndercoverClassicist T·C 08:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Posted – Schwede66 09:09, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
(Ready?) Central European floods
Blurb: Flooding in Central Europe leaves 16 people dead and more missing, as several towns are left submerged. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Severe flooding in central Europe leaves at least 25 dead and 11 missing, as several towns are left submerged.
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by Abcmaxx (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
Nominator's comments: Article only just created as 2024 European floods was too broad and not detailed enough. Significant for a large part of the continent, one of the biggest floods in the countries affected in history. Storm Boris (2024) and Genoa low articles need improvements too. Abcmaxx (talk) 15:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support
until the quality improves.Seems notable for posting though.
- Support
- Noah, BSBATalk 16:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment feels like we are creating excessive articles around these topics. Don't see why this can't be part of storm Boris in this case. Masem (t) 17:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Masem: Storm Boris is a redirect to a wind storm season article subsection. It doesnt have its own article. Noah, BSBATalk 18:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- That subsection is covering the current floods, which seems to be fine. But if there is expansions to be made, that should be the standalone page and not this new flooding page. — Masem (t) 18:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hard disagree. The precedent here is 1997 Central European flood, to which this being frequently compared to. Firstly Storm Boris is just one of the factors that has caused the flooding. Secondly, given the impact and scale a standalone article is very much appropriate here, even though it is yet to be expanded, however I'm sure it will be expanded easily to such a point that WP:FORKs and WP:SIZESPLITs will be needed anyway. Abcmaxx (talk) 20:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- My concern is mostly thus larger trend anound seeming infinite atomization of current event event articles, where editors are given even small facets of larger stories their own article. We want to make the featured article here is sufficiently conpherensive of the cause and effects around the flooding without being too narrow. — Masem (t) 14:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Some of the information has been duplicated from 2024 European floods, but as long as that article can be organised by month instead of by country, that can be easily trimmed down to a summary with a {{main}} link. 2024–25 European windstorm season#Storm Boris is more of a mess, but still I don't think the problem here is anything more than poor linking between the three articles. The September floods due to Boris/Anett are without doubt notable -- this has turned out to be an event at least comparable to a 1997 flood. The storm, which might or might not be notable independently of the floods, currently only has a section in the windstorm list. Did I miss a fork somewhere? Daß Wölf 04:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- My concern is mostly thus larger trend anound seeming infinite atomization of current event event articles, where editors are given even small facets of larger stories their own article. We want to make the featured article here is sufficiently conpherensive of the cause and effects around the flooding without being too narrow. — Masem (t) 14:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hard disagree. The precedent here is 1997 Central European flood, to which this being frequently compared to. Firstly Storm Boris is just one of the factors that has caused the flooding. Secondly, given the impact and scale a standalone article is very much appropriate here, even though it is yet to be expanded, however I'm sure it will be expanded easily to such a point that WP:FORKs and WP:SIZESPLITs will be needed anyway. Abcmaxx (talk) 20:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- That subsection is covering the current floods, which seems to be fine. But if there is expansions to be made, that should be the standalone page and not this new flooding page. — Masem (t) 18:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Masem: Storm Boris is a redirect to a wind storm season article subsection. It doesnt have its own article. Noah, BSBATalk 18:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support, likely comparable to the 1997 or 2014 floods once all the information is tallied up, and the article is of sufficient quality. Suggest changing the blurb to "Storm Boris flooding leaves..." to make it immediately recognisable, as the name seems to have taken on in the media. Unfortunately, I wouldn't expect the article to be exhaustive until well after the event. Unlike e.g. Typhoon Yagi, this is affecting at least half a dozen countries with different languages where weather news commonly stops at the country border. When compared to North America and the UK, severe weather events in continental Europe fairly rarely get comprehensive articles on Wikipedia.
- It's also somewhat hard to tell how long the effects will last. The bulk of precipitation fell on already saturated high ground near the sources of Europe's large rivers, so there might be a second wave of flooding downstream, or another if a warm spell suddenly thaws out the newly accumulated snow in the mountains. For example, the Danube might yet flood northern Serbia and easternmost Croatia [3]. Daß Wölf 08:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - article is undersourced as of now ✈ mike_gigs talkcontribs 13:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support
article quality needs to improveKcmastrpc (talk) 13:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)- Most of the {{cn}} tags have been filled in by now. There is an uncited part of a paragraph in Romania and obviously parts of the article are a day or two out of date, e.g. presumably things are happening in Hungary by now, but unfortunately I don't know Hungarian. Wikipedias in other languages have more content and more sources, if someone is interested in going over them with Google Translate or similar and including up-to-date information. I don't have time to fix it further, but I think what we have now shows the scale of the event well enough. Daß Wölf 04:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed, article is out of stub status, looks good enough for posting. Kcmastrpc (talk) 16:09, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Most of the {{cn}} tags have been filled in by now. There is an uncited part of a paragraph in Romania and obviously parts of the article are a day or two out of date, e.g. presumably things are happening in Hungary by now, but unfortunately I don't know Hungarian. Wikipedias in other languages have more content and more sources, if someone is interested in going over them with Google Translate or similar and including up-to-date information. I don't have time to fix it further, but I think what we have now shows the scale of the event well enough. Daß Wölf 04:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support the article looks good and has the proper amount of citations. This is also a major natural disaster and should be ITN. Scuba 20:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per above. --Oltrepier (talk) 08:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: @Abcmaxx I would suggest you to nominate both 2024–25 European windstorm season and Genoa low to to be listed as Articles for improvement. Oltrepier (talk) 08:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Barely comprehensive enough but comprehensive enough. Bremps... 15:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Widespread flooding affected many countries, and we often don't post ITN items about Central/Eastern Europe enough. OhanaUnitedTalk page 01:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Major natural disaster, article quality is up to par now. The Kip (contribs) 03:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - I suggest posting as a clear consensus is in evidence. International news impacting multiple nations. Jusdafax (talk) 04:33, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
(Closed) European floods
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Flooding in Central and Eastern Europe leaves several people dead and more missing, as several towns are left submerged. (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by Abcmaxx (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
- Wait - As you said, the article isn't ready. I should say wait for the present to get the article improved, and maybe after some more casualties are noted. Maybe after the floods have finished. High Asmiral JMT (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Going by the current article, which covers floods since May, this feels like an inappropriate junction of multiple different weather events, getting in towards synthesis. Would almost definitely need a focus on the page on the storm that actually caused these most recent floods. --Masem (t) 12:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
September 15
September 15, 2024
(Sunday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Science and technology
Sports
|
RD: Elias Khoury
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP News; Al Jazeera
Credits:
- Nominated by Trauma Novitiate (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
According to the Institute for Palestine Studies, Khoury moved between journalism, writing, and teaching. It’s a legacy that can help us to understand the meanings of loyalty, commitment, and Palestine. Trauma Novitiate (talk) 16:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality, article has tags for sourcing and factual accuracy. Suonii180 (talk) 23:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Prime time Emmys
Blurb: At the Emmys, Shōgun wins for Best Drama, and Hacks wins for Best Comedy. (Post)
News source(s): AP
Credits:
- Nominated by Masem (talk · give credit)
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
ITNR but article is no where close to ready lacking any info about the ceremony itself. Masem (t) 13:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality per nom, very little prose. The Kip (contribs) 19:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Tito Jackson
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): E! Online
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:6559:FB9D:9705:1874 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
American musician and member of The Jackson 5. 240F:7A:6253:1:6559:FB9D:9705:1874 (talk) 05:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, article is properly cited and looks good to me. 31.44.224.222 (talk) 10:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, In my opinion, he was only popular on the basis that he was a member of the Jackson 5 but as a solo artist he did not make a significant impact.Kampolama (talk) 13:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- He is still notable, and thus as an RD line suggestion, there's no question about that inclusion outside of quality. — Masem (t) 12:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Kampolama: Anyone with an article is considered notable enough to list as a recent death. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article seems to be in good enough shape. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, article is sufficiently sourced. Suonii180 (talk) 13:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article looks good for posting. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 16:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Unreferenced discography Stephen 00:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Overall article is well sourced. One cn tag shouldn't keep that from getting posted. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 05:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment, I have added some sources to the Discography section. I think it is ready now. Alexcalamaro (talk) 13:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 23:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
(Closed) Trump golf shooting
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: A man is arrested at Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida following his suspected assassination attempt of former U.S. President Donald Trump (pictured). (Post)
News source(s): [4][5]
Credits:
- Nominated by Personisinsterest (talk · give credit)
- Oppose for now. Doesn't look like Trump was in any immediate danger and no shots were fired at him. I also note that there is some surprising ambivalence about the article on its talk page with some even arguing it should be merged into another page. FWIW I think this clearly passes GNG and AFAIK we have articles on all other confirmed attempts on the lives of current and former presidents. But until that gets sorted out, I'd be reluctant to promote this on the main page. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as well. Unlike the assassination attempt in Pennsylvania, nobody was killed or injured. This doesn't have enough due weight to merit a blurb in ITN. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 23:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I don't know what world people are living in where an assassination attempt against a US presidential candidate isn't notable. Scuba 23:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose We have opted not to post known-but-foiled assassination/attacks (before anyone got injured) against major political figures, and this seems to fall into that category. --Masem (t) 23:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Support An attempted assassination on a former president and current presidential nominee is clearly newsworthy, notable and fit for ITN. Dr Fell (talk) 23:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, as no one was killed or even injured. 2604:3D08:9476:BE00:E3:3CA:7026:7EC8 (talk) 00:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per 2604 etc. 64.114 etc 00:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Multiple past assassination attempts on presidents have been discussed here before (there were multiple on Biden, for example). But if the plots were foiled and no injuries or even structural damage occurred, then they weren't considered to have enough due weight to include in ITN. Unless there's some other exceptional reason to include this that hasn't been presented yet, then I see no reason for this to run. SilverserenC 00:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose "shooting" seems very tabloidish, given I've seen no reports that the alleged trespasser ever fired a weapon. And I don't think person arrested with a weapon in the vicinity of a leader (let alone a former leader) is particularly notable, other than perhaps locally. Someone remind me though - when they arrested that nutter in Ottawa who was at Rideau Hall with all those guns, looking to shoot Trudeau - did we post it? That would be a good comparison. Nfitz (talk) 00:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- At least based on searching the archives above for keyword "Trudeau", we've only ever run two ITN blurbs for him, for his election and then re-election. So, no, it doesn't appear to have been posted, not unless whatever was run didn't mention Trudeau at all. SilverserenC 00:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)\
- It looks like it didn't even get a Wikipedia article - surprising given the international news coverage 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; though it is mentioned at Timeline of incidents involving QAnon#Intrusion into Justin Trudeau's residence. It is mentioned at the final attempt of 2020 List of heads of state and government who survived assassination attempts - which seems to show 2 or 3 a year, recently. Which raises the question of how many of those were posted. Nfitz (talk) 01:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- At least based on searching the archives above for keyword "Trudeau", we've only ever run two ITN blurbs for him, for his election and then re-election. So, no, it doesn't appear to have been posted, not unless whatever was run didn't mention Trudeau at all. SilverserenC 00:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)\
- Oppose per above. C F A 💬 00:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not like the other one where Trump almost got killed and others were injured/killed. Nobody was even hurt here.
- Oppose This appears to be more of a concept of an assassination attempt. --Pats2017 (talk) 01:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. No shots were fired, and nobody was injured or killed. -insert valid name here- (talk) 01:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose appears to be closer to a foiled "assassination plot", as the suspect did not fire any shots, and was (thankfully) apprehended before getting close enough to the former president. Natg 19 (talk) 01:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - unlike the previous attempt, no one was injured. --RockstoneSend me a message! 01:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose "Shooting" in the article title is very generous considering not a single bullet was fired towards Trump, No injuries or lasting effects Hungry403 (talk) 02:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
RD: Robert F. Titus
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Starrs
Credits:
- Nominated by Toadboy123 (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: United States Air Force brigadier general and fighter pilot Toadboy123 (talk) 23:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wait, article needs additional citations. 31.44.224.222 (talk) 10:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed the missing citations. Toadboy123 (talk) 14:16, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support once improved: article also needs a look for WP:NPOV and WP:PROMO. UndercoverClassicist T·C 14:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I don't see any cn tags, article looks good. Scuba 15:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article looks good. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 23:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Decorations are unreferenced. Stephen 23:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- I fixed it by adding sources for US military decorations awarded. Toadboy123 (talk) 11:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
September 14
September 14, 2024
(Saturday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Politics and elections
|
RD: Elaine DePrince
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Cielquiparle (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Jkaharper (talk · give credit) and Ljt96 (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Brand-new article started after her death was finally made public on September 14. She led a very full life as a non-fiction author and mother of 11 children including 9 adopted, 3 of whom were hemophiliacs who died of AIDS, plus Michaela DePrince (who happened to die less than 24 hours before her). Cielquiparle (talk) 16:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Fernando Puche
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Málaga CF
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Unknown Temptation (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Spanish businessman, owner of Málaga CF...and convicted tobacco smuggler fined over €16 million. Newly created. All sources in Spanish Unknown Temptation (talk) 20:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article looks good. Ready to go. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 23:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 23:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Berit Ås
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NRK
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Oceanh (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Norwegian psychologist and feminist politician, known for articulating the five master suppression techniques. Needs better referencing. Oceanh (talk) 02:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Nominator has significantly improved referencing since the nomination. There's only one cite tag at the moment for something that does not strike me as super controversial, which isn't sufficient to hold up the article. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 17:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 12:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
September 13
September 13, 2024
(Friday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
|
RD: Lex Marinos
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [6], [7]
Credits:
- Nominated by Happily888 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by That Article Editing Guy (talk · give credit), ClaudineChionh (talk · give credit) and NotoriousFKB (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Happily888 (talk) 05:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Birth date, some of the early section and the filmography needs more sourcing. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 16:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
RD: Mary McFadden
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NY Times
Credits:
- Nominated by Thriley (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
American fashion designer. The "High Priestess of Fashion" according to Vogue. Thriley (talk) 21:27, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Career section can use some expansion but otherwise meets the minimum requirement. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 16:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Career section could be expanded (tagged) and the lead can also be expanded. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 23:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Wolfgang Gerhardt
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): FAZ
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Grimes2 (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
German politician. Grimes2 (talk) 13:18, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Prose is 1,572 character, barely over a stub. This man was leader of Germany's third party for six years and was leader of the opposition, albeit for six months. What did he propose in his many election campaigns and how did he act in opposition to Merkel? My knowledge of German language and politics is far too low to expand this, however. Unknown Temptation (talk) 21:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. Please read the bottom line in the yellow box containing the nomination. Black Kite (talk) 21:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Leaving aside whether it's true, it's not irrelevant at all -- this is a comment on the article's quality, and a suggestion that it needs some minimal coverage of his political positions and actions to meet the quality bar. The line you point to includes
Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
, which is exactly what this comment is doing. UndercoverClassicist T·C 07:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC) - The small text says all humans, animals etc. are assumed to be notable enough to post. I never doubted that. What I said was that the page is just over the length of a stub. Would we ever consider posting a page on a Liberal Democrats leader like Charles Kennedy or Paddy Ashdown if the page was just over the definition of a stub, and a mere list of offices held rather than who they were as politicians and people? This may not be GA or FA nomination but a certain limit of length and completeness should be met. Unknown Temptation (talk) 15:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- DYK asks for 300 words. I don't think it's unreasonable for ITN to require as least 300 words, too. The word count is 250 now. Let's have more prose in this wikibio. Pretty sure there's more to write about this guy's career in politics. When coverage of the wikibio appears to be incomplete, it's a good reason not to feature it on the RD line, methinks. --PFHLai (talk) 21:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Leaving aside whether it's true, it's not irrelevant at all -- this is a comment on the article's quality, and a suggestion that it needs some minimal coverage of his political positions and actions to meet the quality bar. The line you point to includes
- Irrelevant. Please read the bottom line in the yellow box containing the nomination. Black Kite (talk) 21:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Procedural support meets minimum requirements This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 00:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per above 27.96.223.192 (talk) 07:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support meets the bare minimum requirement but it would be better if there is a bit more content. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 16:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Michaela DePrince
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): People magazine; Reuters; The Guardian
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Cielquiparle (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Cwillsdance (talk · give credit), Deathisallaroundus (talk · give credit), Strattonsmith (talk · give credit) and Funcrunch (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Huge loss to world of ballet. Life and career covered extensively in reliable secondary sources. Cielquiparle (talk) 21:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wait As yet, there don't seem to be any details of the death and, as she was just 29, a more substantial update will be expected. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Does it really matter if we know more details of the death for the article update to be "substantial" enough to pass muster for RD? We know she's recently died, reliable sources have reported on it, and the article has been updated to reflect as such. RachelTensions (talk) 05:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it matters. As I understand it, this based on an Instagram post repeated by People magazine which doesn't strike me as especially reliable. This is breaking news based on primary sources and, as an encyclopedia with a strict BLP policy, we should use these with care. WP:ITNUPDATE says that a "
a one-sentence update is highly questionable
" and one sentence is still all that we've got. Andrew🐉(talk) 06:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)- Now reported by Reuters and in the Guardian. UndercoverClassicist T·C 07:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Her family issued a statement as well. Also cited in the People magazine article. Anyway I just added a citation needed tag that I can't resolve right now as I'm going offline and also what is up with licensing for that Teen Vogue video in the infobox? Cielquiparle (talk) 07:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Have resolved my own citation-needed tag now. Cielquiparle (talk) 10:48, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Her family issued a statement as well. Also cited in the People magazine article. Anyway I just added a citation needed tag that I can't resolve right now as I'm going offline and also what is up with licensing for that Teen Vogue video in the infobox? Cielquiparle (talk) 07:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Now reported by Reuters and in the Guardian. UndercoverClassicist T·C 07:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it matters. As I understand it, this based on an Instagram post repeated by People magazine which doesn't strike me as especially reliable. This is breaking news based on primary sources and, as an encyclopedia with a strict BLP policy, we should use these with care. WP:ITNUPDATE says that a "
- Does it really matter if we know more details of the death for the article update to be "substantial" enough to pass muster for RD? We know she's recently died, reliable sources have reported on it, and the article has been updated to reflect as such. RachelTensions (talk) 05:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, the article is ready. I don't think that lacking the cause of death should retain its posting. Alexcalamaro (talk) 09:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support article is ready now. There is enough information about her untimely death. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 11:02, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support: the gaps in the article reflect the sources, so should be no impediment to posting. UndercoverClassicist T·C 12:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, everything looks sourced. Suonii180 (talk) 15:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Article appears to be well-sourced. Funcrunch (talk) 20:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 02:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) Borno State flooding
Blurb: The Alau Dam collapse leads to flash flooding in Borno State, Nigeria that kills over 30 people and displaces over 400 000. (Post)
News source(s): [8]
Credits:
- Nominated by Scaramouche33 (talk · give credit)
Seems to be a major humanitarian crisis and it has been described as the region's worst flooding in 30 years. Scaramouche33 (talk) 12:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Tentative support: article isn't great (one sentence on the causes, and no mention of what was wrong with the dam?), but it does seem to be fully cited, and the event is certainly significant in my view (nearly half a million people displaced). UndercoverClassicist T·C 19:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I expanded the Causes section a little bit by adding more details about the dam collapse.Scaramouche33 (talk) 04:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- The dam broke on the 10th, that doesn't make it stale yet, but these type of details are clearly missing in the article. --Masem (t) 19:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I added the date(which I had included in the initial version of the article but apparently it was not included in the second version). Scaramouche33 (talk) 04:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support in principle ; major disaster, but article is not up to scuff This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 00:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support article is long enough and looks good to go. Therapyisgood (talk) 01:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 02:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Pravin Gordhan
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): news24
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Sportsnut24 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Twice former fin min of africa's then-largest economy.Sportsnut24 (talk) 08:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Provisional oppose: significance is granted by having an article, but there are CN tags needing to be addressed. Would support once fully sourced. UndercoverClassicist T·C 09:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I added citations to the article and I think it should now be acceptable for RD. Scaramouche33 (talk) 07:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support all the issues have been resolved, I think it is ready to be posted. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 11:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Is the article good to go?Scaramouche33 (talk) 04:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Posted—Bagumba (talk) 09:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
September 12
September 12, 2024
(Thursday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Science and technology
|
(Withdrawn) Ongoing: Typhoon Yagi
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Credits:
- Nominated by HurricaneEdgar (talk · give credit)
- Oppose As you say, the storm has dissipated. All the subsequent daily death in the world won't change that. Every event has an aftermath. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:59, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It’s currently the top blurb & it’s dissipated, so there’s no need to put it in “Ongoing“. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 00:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose What's ongoing about a storm that is no longer ongoing? RachelTensions (talk) 02:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Stephen Peat
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Province, Sportsnet
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by GhostRiver (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Troubled ex-NHLer was struck by a car two weeks ago. Succumbed to his injuries today. Have spent the afternoon buffing up the article and making sure everything important is cited. — GhostRiver 21:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well-buffed, GhostRiver. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support: article looks in good shape. UndercoverClassicist T·C 06:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support article is in a good shape. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 11:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Great improvements with sourcing. Article in good shape. GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Posted. Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
(Decision needed) Polaris Dawn
Blurb: Jared Isaacman and Sarah Gillis conduct the first commercial spacewalk during the Polaris Dawn private space mission. (Post)
Alternative blurb: During the Polaris Dawn space mission, astronauts Jared Isaacman and Sarah Gillis orbit the Earth at a record distance of 1,400 kilometers, breaking the previous record set by Gemini 11.
News source(s): NYT, Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by Sandstein (talk · give credit)
No strong feelings either way, but we normally post space firsts, right? Sandstein 15:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: data in the table of launch attempts seems only sparsely cited. Do we feel that this qualifies as a "first", given that spacewalks themselves are routine -- the difference here is who has organised/funded it? UndercoverClassicist T·C 15:59, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- That's certainly up for debate, although the media do treat this as a "first", reflecting the increasing commercialization and privatization of spaceflight. Sandstein 16:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support a first for space exploration. Scuba 16:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - In The News, major milestone in human spaceflight PrecariousWorlds (talk) 16:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - It's not a major milestone in human spaceflight. It's a small milestone in the organisational backing of human spaceflight. Operationally, a spacewalk is a spacewalk. GenevieveDEon (talk) 16:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- I guess every major news outlet is just lying in saying that the first commercial spacewalk is a major milestone. Scuba 16:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's hype. News outlets frequently produce hype. Of more interest on the operational front is that this was a spacewalk without airlocks. To my mind 'first commercial spacewalk' is one of those excessively-specific superlatives, like 'tallest actor' or 'first Frenchman to cycle around the world'. I don't see the operational activity's dependence on the commercial organisation supporting it as especially remarkable. GenevieveDEon (talk) 16:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- I don't understand the point you're trying to make, the superlatives that you listed exist and aren't that ridiculous. It being commercial is the whole point, the commercial space race has been proof that the age of big bloated government agencies dominating every aspect of space travel is over. SpaceX doesn't get 0.48% of the US budget every year to only make one rocket every 4 years like NASA with SLS. Scuba 03:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's hype. News outlets frequently produce hype. Of more interest on the operational front is that this was a spacewalk without airlocks. To my mind 'first commercial spacewalk' is one of those excessively-specific superlatives, like 'tallest actor' or 'first Frenchman to cycle around the world'. I don't see the operational activity's dependence on the commercial organisation supporting it as especially remarkable. GenevieveDEon (talk) 16:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Agree with GenevieveDEon. This is just a hyped up news story because of SpaceX, and because of a billionaire who is part of the team. What is fundamentally different from this and other spacewalks, which have been done numerous times by NASA or Roscosmos astronauts? We have already posted other "firsts" for commercial spaceflight, but this to me is an insignificant "first". Natg 19 (talk) 16:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Because it isn't being done by NASA or Roscosmos or any governmental agency, it's being done by a private company. Scuba 03:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I guess every major news outlet is just lying in saying that the first commercial spacewalk is a major milestone. Scuba 16:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - This is still a big deal; it really doesn't matter if a billionaire was involved. Inspiration4 was blurbed as it was the first all-civilian spaceflight, I feel like the first ever commercial spacewalk should get the same treatment. qw3rty 17:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - in addition to the big media coverage for the first commercial spacewalk, also of significance is that the earth orbit achieved an altitude of over 1,400 kilometres - breaking the 1,370 km crewed record set in 1966 by Gemini 11/Agena. (of course the moonshot orbits were technically higher, so technically the Apollo missions were further away while trans-lunar or in lunar orbit. There's also been a new record set of 19 people in earth orbit simultaneously (on two space stations, with 5 capsules - Polaris Dawn, Soyuz MS-25, Soyuz MS-26, SpaceX Crew-8, and Shenzhou 18. Arguably, each of these three records should be blurbed. Combining into one seems more than reasonable. Nfitz (talk) 18:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think any of those should be blurbed. They're all just 'mosts' of things we don't normally pay attention to measuring at all. And if we're talking about the achievements of private space flight, one of the things it has done is to raise the number of people currently in Earth orbit by stranding two people on the ISS for six months. I also don't think that an altitude record that arbitrarily excludes the Apollo astronauts is a record at all. GenevieveDEon (talk) 21:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Apparently also the most people in vacuum at once, per the article. Sandstein 18:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well - other than Columbia, which was in near vacuum when it broke up. :( Nfitz (talk) 05:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Apparently also the most people in vacuum at once, per the article. Sandstein 18:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
per our article it wasn't a space walk... The cabin was open to space, and both persons stood at the opening but dud not leave the ship. It's a progressive step but not really a full space walk.ETA - those lines in the article have been removed, and given nearly no reliable sources puts doubt about this being a spacewalk that those lines give, then that removes that concern. Masem (t) 18:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)- And yet the couple in the part of the unpressurized Mir station (coming from a pressurized Soyuz after the Progress M-34 collision) are called spacewalks. And what about Apollo 9? Nfitz (talk) 19:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Both of those cases have crew moving between two vessels, even if the distance was short. — Masem (t) 20:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- the crew moved here too. Isaacman stuck himself out the hatch, and then went back in. How is that any different? Scuba 03:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- And yet those are classified as space walks. I don't see the issue here ... he was only touching the tether at points, just like any other space walk outside the space station. But yes, his legs were dandling down into the hatch. I feel this is splitting hairs, and ignores the three other firsts in relation to orbit height, number of people in orbit total, and also the first exposure of 4 people to the vacuum of space at once (assuming the Columbia explosion doesn't count). Nfitz (talk) 05:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Both of those cases have crew moving between two vessels, even if the distance was short. — Masem (t) 20:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- I feel like this is an arbitrary distinction to be made. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 23:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- And yet the couple in the part of the unpressurized Mir station (coming from a pressurized Soyuz after the Progress M-34 collision) are called spacewalks. And what about Apollo 9? Nfitz (talk) 19:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per GDE above, especially then finding out that it wasn't actually even a full space walk, per Masem. Slidinghorn (talk) 18:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: Billionaire does spacewalk. Nothing incredible. Tofusaurus (talk) 06:37, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see what makes a commercial spacewalk so special compared to something like a routine one done at the ISS where they actually leave the spacecraft. Hungry403 (talk) 06:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support It's in the news, unlike the stale stuff that we're currently blurbing. And when reliable and respectable sources such as the NYT describe it as a milestone, that beats the OR/POV above.
- As for the spacewalk, our article tells us that this mode is called a "stand-up EVA (SEVA)". Me, I'm more impressed that they've chosen to fly through the Van Allen belt to see how bad the radiation is.
- Note also that we have pictures of the crew and so can use and rotate them.
- Andrew🐉(talk) 08:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Me, I'm more impressed that they've chosen to fly through the Van Allen belt to see how bad the radiation is.
Same here, that seems like an awfully foolish endeavor to put a civilian crew through. Duly signed, ⛵ WaltClipper -(talk) 13:37, 13 September 2024 (UTC)- I feel like the teams of thousands of highly qualified engineers and physicists know what they're doing PrecariousWorlds (talk) 16:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- More dangerous: if any of them moved into the ISS for a 6-mo. tour of duty, where they would get about 70 mSv over that period. Or, venturing outside the Earth's protective magnetosphere fully. The Apollo crews which took the full trip "next door" and back, round-tripped through both belts; there are two and I'm not sure but is Polaris just doing the inner belt? Anyway, the Apollo crews got mission doses maxing out a bit over 10 mSv. And, most of that was not the belts, but all the rads our Sun is blasting out everywhere all the time! (Yes I got a headache trying to make sense of those confusing different units. This is why the SI is good, folks.)
- Other slightly dangerous pastimes rad-wise (see helpful images here): spending a year in Winnipeg: 4 mSv; a body CT scan: around 6–8 mSv; a coronary angiogram: 12 mSv (yes, more than most Apollo crews); working as an aviation crew member: varies widely and unpredictably, but estimated upper bound at or potentially more than 5 mSv/year. The dose makes the poison. (Fascinatingly, astronauts frequently report perceiving flashes of light caused by cosmic rays crashing through their bodies and triggering them! Mir got hit by a solar storm once and a crew member said the flashes were so bright and numerous they interfered with his sleep!) --Slowking Man (talk) 23:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- All I'm saying is there's a reason the Royal Aviation Museum of Western Canada, Boeing Winnipeg and the Winnipeg Jets keep to the traditionally "commercial" altitudes they do. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also come to think of it, public service announcement: make sure you check if your home has radon risk, and have it tested if it is. This is the radiation risk the average person should be most concerned about. (Besides avoiding tobacco) Also make sure to test and replace smoke + CO detectors on schedule! Slowking Man (talk) 09:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Slightly misleading; the Apollo spacecraft was only in a parking orbit around Earth for a brief period of time (aside from Apollo 7 and Apollo 9) as it transited rather quickly through the Van Allen belts, so it wasn't prolonged exposure as a low Earth orbit with a 1,400 kilometer perigee would have been. Duly signed, ⛵ WaltClipper -(talk) 13:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - it being the first commercial spacewalk is very different than being the first spacewalk. Posting the former is closer to advertising, the latter an actual first. nableezy - 11:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Andrew, significant milestone that has garnered considerable media attention globally. See sources cited at Extravehicular_activity#By_SpaceX. Majority Oppose votes are POV/OR, essentially, "Wealthy SpaceMan Bad". Kcmastrpc (talk) 13:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Sadly, this would only have been notable if the spacewalk had gone wrong. Duly signed, ⛵ WaltClipper -(talk) 13:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Notable achievement in commercial space flight, as well as other firsts per Nfitz, Rockview13 (talk) 16:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose current blurb Disagree that there is anything particularly notable or groundbreaking about the first "commercialized" spaceflight - do we do a separate post for commercial versus non-commercial "firsts" with any other achievements? IMHO if we did post, what makes it notable is that it achieved a record-high orbit, as per the title of this other NYT article. If we do blurb, that is probably what the blurb should highlight. When the NYT calls it "groundbreaking" or a "record", that is the record they are referring to - the highest orbit ever reached which was not part of a mission to the moon. FlipandFlopped ツ 20:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Alt Blurb I think it is a very notable achievement and deserves to be posted, the article's quality is also sufficient. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 11:07, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Though "spacewalk" is kind of sus as one hand never left the ship, feet were on the ladder, and he was never out there floating around like we often see in pictures. As such, if the other crewmembers were also exposed to the vacuum of space didn't they "spacewalk" too? CoatCheck (talk) 22:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- The correct term seems to be Extravehicular activity? ("In space, no one can walk"!) Martinevans123 (talk) 09:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support for being the first commercial spacewalk, and having major notability. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 00:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - A first commerical spacewalk is a very great space first, as before spacewalks were only conducted by space organizations, I think. High Asmiral JMT (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per GenevieveDEon Ornithoptera (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
(RD posted) RD: Sitaram Yechury
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb: Indian communist leader Sitaram Yechury dies at the age of 72. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Sitaram Yechury General Secretary of Communist Party of India (India National party), dies at the age of 72.
News source(s): BBC,Indianexpress
Credits:
- Nominated by Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk · give credit)
- Updated by SerChevalerie (talk · give credit), Pachu Kannan (talk · give credit) and Spworld2 (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Indian communist leader Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wait - The 'Books' section of his article is entirely unsourced. Would support once this is fixed. - Bucket of sulfuric acid (talk | contribs) 11:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support RD Added sources in the "Books" section. Pachu Kannan (talk) 14:07, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Communist Indian leader (Major figures) (WP:ITNRDBLURB) ~ Spworld2 (talk) 9:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support RD, oppose blurb : Not notable enough to warrant a blurb. Tofusaurus (talk) 06:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- RD only, not notable like a world leader to warrant a blurb. 31.44.224.222 (talk) 10:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- RD only support, not notable enough for a blurb. Sharrdx (talk) 21:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- RD only but only after cn tags have been resolved. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 11:07, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Added more sources. Pachu Kannan (talk) 14:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- RD only Lacks notability for a blurb, had no national importance in the executive government Varoon2542
- Posted to RD—Bagumba (talk) 09:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Aussie Malcolm
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Stuff
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Abcmaxx (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Missing exact date of death, announced today; otherwise good article. Abcmaxx (talk) 07:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks good. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 10:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article looks in good enough shape, though could use a bit of expansion (I'll try to do that if I have the time). Kiwichris (talk) 10:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Adequately sourced and overall in good shape. - Bucket of sulfuric acid (talk | contribs) 11:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Structure looks good enough and no problems found. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 21:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Posted. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Elli: can I get an ITN nomination recognition on my talk page please? Abcmaxx (talk) 22:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done Black Kite (talk) 22:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oops, sorry about that; hadn't done much ITN before so forgot about that step. Oh well, more things to learn. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done Black Kite (talk) 22:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Elli: can I get an ITN nomination recognition on my talk page please? Abcmaxx (talk) 22:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Pull He has been posthumously accused of child sexual abuse. Our article is not complete in its current state. Bremps... 18:13, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
References
Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com]
rather than using <ref></ref>
tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.
For the times when <ref></ref>
tags are being used, here are their contents: